AMD
Radeon 780M 8700G vs Intel Arc A380
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc A380
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 780M 8700G and Arc A380 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗780M 8700G outperforms Arc A380 by ~39% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+39%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 780M 8700G
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR
Reasons to consider Arc A380
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
IntelPerformance
Price / performance
5036
98100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 8–13of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 780M 8700G
173 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A380
Price $190.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50Better
36
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40Better
30
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
48
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
55
55
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
Power consumption—
TFLOPSBetter
Clock speedBetter
VRAM
Memory type
Memory frequency—
Upscaling
Compute API
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Release date
Launch price—
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
Process nodeBetter
Max monitors
Length
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Thickness
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Memory bus
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 780M 8700G and Arc A380 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
780M 8700GArc A380
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
206 FPS
188 FPS
1080p Ultra
145 FPS
129 FPS
1440p Ultra
113 FPS
69 FPS
4K Ultra
56 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2780M 8700G206 FPSArc A380188 FPS780M 8700G145 FPSArc A380129 FPS780M 8700G113 FPSArc A38069 FPS780M 8700G56 FPSArc A38023 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077780M 8700G133 FPSArc A380121 FPS780M 8700G115 FPSArc A380102 FPS780M 8700G82 FPSArc A38050 FPS780M 8700G38 FPSArc A38015 FPS
Forza Horizon 5780M 8700G168 FPSArc A380153 FPS780M 8700G109 FPSArc A38097 FPS780M 8700G102 FPSArc A38062 FPS780M 8700G82 FPSArc A38034 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy780M 8700G109 FPSArc A38099 FPS780M 8700G91 FPSArc A38081 FPS780M 8700G73 FPSArc A38045 FPS780M 8700G38 FPSArc A38016 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100503633%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100584427%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100504315%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100060200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1000100200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10050476%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10050468%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100504315%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10050492%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100504315%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedXe-HPG
Process node4 nmBetter6 nm
Release date20232022
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified7200 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified157 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified1024
Base clock800 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock2900 MHzBetter2000 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x8
LengthOEM dependent222 mm
ThicknessOEM dependentDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent250 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent4
Max resolutionOEM dependent7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM- SMA6 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory busSystem memory interface96 bit
TFLOPS8.91Better4.198
Other comparisons
GTX 1650 GDDR6NVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 65
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 780M 8700G or Arc A380?+
780M 8700G has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A380 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
780M 8700G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
780M 8700G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
780M 8700G offers more overall performance, while 780M 8700G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
780M 8700G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A380 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
780M 8700G leads in combined 1440p performance. 780M 8700G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
780M 8700G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A380 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A380 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 780M 8700G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.