H2H

GeForce 8600 GS vs Radeon RX 5700

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared 8600 GS and RX 5700 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8600 GS outperforms RX 5700 by 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+2%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce 8600 GS vs Radeon RX 5700: key takeaway

The comparison of 8600 GS and RX 5700 shows a 2% advantage for 8600 GS in gaming performance, while RX 5700 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4645
Efficiency
10083
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
1368
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

8600 GS is the best overall choice

8600 GS leads in combined game performance. 8600 GS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE6%

8600 GS leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$75

8600 GS costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 45–50of 317
8600 GS#47position in the GPU ranking
RX 5700#78position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 5700

176 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8600 GS

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares 8600 GS and RX 5700 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Category8600 GSRX 5700
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46Better
45
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40Better
39
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37Better
36
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
83
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67Better
63
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares 8600 GS and RX 5700 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specification8600 GSRX 5700
Device classDesktopDesktop
Power consumption47 WBetter180 W
HDMIHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
DirectX10.012.1
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
TFLOPS0.0387.949Better
Memory frequency800 MHzBetter14 GHz
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
Release date20072019
ArchitectureTeslaRDNA 1.0
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
UpscalingFSR
LengthVaries by board268 mm
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$79Better$299
Clock speed540 MHz1465 - 1625 MHzBetter
Base clock540 MHz1465 MHzBetter
Boost clock540 MHz1625 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth12800 GB/sBetter448 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 4x16
Power consumption47 WBetter180 W
Process node80 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU200 WBetter450 W
Die size169 mm²Better251 mm²
Transistor count289 million10300 millionBetter
Shader units / cores162304Better
Memory cacheL2 0.03 MBL2 4 MB
Max monitors34
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares 8600 GS and RX 5700 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

8600 GSRX 5700
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
26 FPSEstimated 65%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
22 FPSEstimated 65%
20 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 61%
15 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
6 FPSEstimated 57%
6 FPSEstimated 60%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: Wukong8600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%
Call of Duty: Warzone8600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%
Counter-Strike 28600 GS220 FPSEstimated 73%RX 5700196 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GS154 FPSEstimated 73%RX 5700138 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GS98 FPSEstimated 69%RX 5700107 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GS37 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570040 FPSEstimated 68%
Cyberpunk 20778600 GS142 FPSEstimated 73%RX 5700126 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GS122 FPSEstimated 73%RX 5700109 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GS71 FPSEstimated 69%RX 570078 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GS25 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570027 FPSEstimated 68%
Forza Horizon 58600 GS179 FPSEstimated 79%RX 5700159 FPSEstimated 80%8600 GS116 FPSEstimated 73%RX 5700103 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GS88 FPSEstimated 69%RX 570096 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GS54 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570058 FPSEstimated 68%
God of War Ragnarök8600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%
Hogwarts Legacy8600 GS116 FPSEstimated 73%RX 5700103 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GS97 FPSEstimated 73%RX 570086 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GS64 FPSEstimated 69%RX 570069 FPSEstimated 74%8600 GS25 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570027 FPSEstimated 68%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 20248600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%
Monster Hunter Wilds8600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%
Starfield8600 GS26 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS22 FPSEstimated 65%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS14 FPSEstimated 61%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8600 GS6 FPSEstimated 57%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%
Average FPS8600 GS81 FPSRX 570072 FPS8600 GS62 FPSRX 570056 FPS8600 GS41 FPSRX 570044 FPS8600 GS18 FPSRX 570019 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares 8600 GS and RX 5700 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8600 GSRX 5700Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10046452%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100375030%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100375234%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001368136%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001008319%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares 8600 GS and RX 5700 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Index8600 GSRX 5700Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100315556%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100335448%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100375234%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100285870%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100365236%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares 8600 GS and RX 5700 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GSRX 5700
DirectX10.012.1
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 2.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares 8600 GS and RX 5700 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GSRX 5700
ArchitectureTeslaRDNA 1.0
Process node80 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20072019
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares 8600 GS and RX 5700 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GSRX 5700
Transistor count289 million10300 millionBetter
Die size169 mm²Better251 mm²
Shader units / cores162304Better
Base clock540 MHz1465 MHzBetter
Boost clock540 MHz1625 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares 8600 GS and RX 5700 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GSRX 5700
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 4x16
LengthVaries by board268 mm
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU200 WBetter450 W
Power connectorNone6+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares 8600 GS and RX 5700 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GSRX 5700
HDMIHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors34
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares 8600 GS and RX 5700 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

Specifications8600 GSRX 5700
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.0387.949Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device A8600 GS67
Device BRX 570063
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: 8600 GS or RX 5700?

8600 GS has the higher overall gaming score, while 8600 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

8600 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

8600 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

8600 GS offers more overall performance, while 8600 GS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

8600 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

8600 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

8600 GS leads in combined 1440p performance. 8600 GS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

8600 GS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8600 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8600 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to 8600 GS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.