H2H

Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce 8800 GT

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 5700 and 8800 GT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5700 outperforms 8800 GT by 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+15%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce 8800 GT: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 5700 and 8800 GT shows a 15% advantage for RX 5700 in gaming performance, while 8800 GT may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4539
Efficiency
83100
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
6813
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RX 5700 is the best overall choice

RX 5700 leads in combined game performance. RX 5700 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE2%

RX 5700 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$75

8800 GT costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 76–81of 317
RX 5700#78position in the GPU ranking
8800 GT#84position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 5700

176 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8800 GT

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 5700 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 57008800 GT
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
45Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
39Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
62
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 5700 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 57008800 GT
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.0b
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSR
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
DirectX12.110.0
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL4.63.3
TFLOPS7.949Better0.336
Power consumption180 W125 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Power connector6+8 pin6 pin
Release date20192007
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0Tesla
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Launch price$299$79Better
Shader units / cores2304Better112
Clock speed1465 - 1625 MHzBetter600 MHz
Base clock1465 MHzBetter600 MHz
Boost clock1625 MHzBetter600 MHz
VRAM8 GB GDDR6512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory frequency14 GHzBetter1,8 GHz
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth448 GB/sBetter58 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Power consumption180 W125 WBetter
Process node7 nmBetter65 nm
Recommended PSU450 W300 WBetter
Length268 mm229 mmBetter
Die size251 mm²Better324 mm²
Memory cacheL2 4 MBL2 0.06 MB
Transistor count10300 millionBetter754 million
Max monitors43
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 5700 and 8800 GT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 57008800 GT
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
15 FPSEstimated 66%
11 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
6 FPSEstimated 60%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 5700196 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GT195 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700138 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GT137 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700107 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GT77 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570040 FPSEstimated 68%8800 GT29 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 5700126 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GT126 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700109 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GT108 FPSEstimated 72%RX 570078 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GT56 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570027 FPSEstimated 68%8800 GT19 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 5RX 5700159 FPSEstimated 80%8800 GT159 FPSEstimated 78%RX 5700103 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GT103 FPSEstimated 72%RX 570096 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GT69 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570058 FPSEstimated 68%8800 GT43 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War RagnarökRX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 5700103 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GT103 FPSEstimated 72%RX 570086 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GT86 FPSEstimated 72%RX 570069 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GT50 FPSEstimated 66%RX 570027 FPSEstimated 68%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 570023 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT23 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570020 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 570015 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GT11 FPSEstimated 58%RX 57006 FPSEstimated 60%8800 GT5 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSRX 570072 FPS8800 GT72 FPSRX 570056 FPS8800 GT55 FPSRX 570044 FPS8800 GT32 FPSRX 570019 FPS8800 GT14 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 5700 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 57008800 GTDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100453914%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100503244%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100523248%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1006813136%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008310019%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 5700 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 57008800 GTDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100552768%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100542863%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100523248%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100582483%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100523151%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 5700 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 57008800 GT
DirectX12.110.0
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 5700 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 57008800 GT
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0Tesla
Process node7 nmBetter65 nm
Release date20192007
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 5700 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 57008800 GT
Transistor count10300 millionBetter754 million
Die size251 mm²Better324 mm²
Shader units / cores2304Better112
Base clock1465 MHzBetter600 MHz
Boost clock1625 MHzBetter600 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 5700 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 57008800 GT
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Length268 mm229 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU450 W300 WBetter
Power connector6+8 pin6 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 5700 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 57008800 GT
HDMIHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 5700 and 8800 GT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 57008800 GT
VRAM8 GB GDDR6512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS7.949Better0.336
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 570063
Device B8800 GT62
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 5700 or 8800 GT?

RX 5700 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 5700 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

8800 GT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

8800 GT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 5700 offers more overall performance, while RX 5700 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

8800 GT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 5700 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 5700 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 5700 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 5700 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8800 GT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8800 GT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 5700 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.