NVIDIA
GeForce 8800 GT vs Radeon HD 6750
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
HD 6750
Aggregate performance score
We've compared 8800 GT and HD 6750 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗8800 GT outperforms HD 6750 by ~26% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+26%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce 8800 GT (~10%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider 8800 GT
- Higher catalog performance index
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Reasons to consider HD 6750
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.2 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3931
100100
100100
1356
Graphics card ranking
Positions 79–84of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon HD 6750
111 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon HD 6750
Price $15.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
DirectX
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Vulkan
HDMI
Upscaling
DisplayPort
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares 8800 GT and HD 6750 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
8800 GTHD 6750
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
195 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
137 FPS
109 FPS
1440p Ultra
77 FPS
60 FPS
4K Ultra
29 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 28800 GT195 FPSHD 6750157 FPS8800 GT137 FPSHD 6750109 FPS8800 GT77 FPSHD 675060 FPS8800 GT29 FPSHD 675021 FPS
Cyberpunk 20778800 GT126 FPSHD 6750102 FPS8800 GT108 FPSHD 675086 FPS8800 GT56 FPSHD 675043 FPS8800 GT19 FPSHD 675014 FPS
Forza Horizon 58800 GT159 FPSHD 6750128 FPS8800 GT103 FPSHD 675082 FPS8800 GT69 FPSHD 675054 FPS8800 GT43 FPSHD 675031 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy8800 GT103 FPSHD 675083 FPS8800 GT86 FPSHD 675068 FPS8800 GT50 FPSHD 675039 FPS8800 GT20 FPSHD 675014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100393123%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10032346%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100323817%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001356125%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100274243%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100284138%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100323817%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100244561%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100313820%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.011.0
VulkanNot supportedNot supported
OpenGL3.34.4
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1OpenCL 1.2
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaTeraScale 2
Process node65 nm40 nmBetter
Release date20072011
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count754 million1040 millionBetter
Die size324 mm²166 mm²Better
Shader units / cores112720Better
Base clock600 MHz700 MHzBetter
Boost clock600 MHz700 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 2x16
Length229 mm170 mmBetter
ThicknessSingle-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU300 W250 WBetter
Power connector6 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIBoard dependentHDMI 1.3a
DisplayPortBoard dependentmini-DisplayPort 1.1
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors35
Max resolution2560 × 16004096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM512 MB GDDR3Better1 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS0.3361.008Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 8800 GT or HD 6750?+
8800 GT has the higher overall gaming score, while 8800 GT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
8800 GT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
8800 GT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
8800 GT offers more overall performance, while 8800 GT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
8800 GT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
8800 GT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
8800 GT leads in combined 1440p performance. 8800 GT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
8800 GT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
HD 6750 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
HD 6750 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 8800 GT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.