GeForce 9300 GSVSIntel Arc A310
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce 9300 GS+2%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
9300 GS
VSWINNER9300 GS2%H2H overall index
Intel
Arc A310
Performance4039
Efficiency100100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4039
100100
100100
1360
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIA9300 GS0No verified public setup yet
IntelArc A3100No verified public setup yet
COMPARISON RESULT
9300 GS is the best overall choice
9300 GS leads in combined gaming performance. 9300 GS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
9300 GS leads in the combined performance index
9300 GS costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 72–77of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 9300 GS
0 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 9300 GS
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
40Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
100Better
31
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
33Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
62
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6Better
Clock speed567 MHz1750 - 2000 MHzBetter
Base clock567 MHz1750 MHzBetter
Boost clock567 MHz2000 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better4 GB GDDR6
VRAM capacity512 MBBetter4 GB
Memory frequency667 MHzBetter15,5 GHz
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
Memory bandwidth5336 GB/sBetter124 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x8Better
Power connector--
Power consumption30 WBetter75 W
TDP30 WBetter75 W
Process node65 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20082022Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS0.0222.688Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10040393%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100334633%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100324534%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001360129%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100284955%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100294849%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100324534%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100255168%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100324534%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node65 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20082022Better
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock567 MHz1750 MHzBetter
Boost clock567 MHz2000 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x8Better
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector--
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM512 MB DDR2Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6Better
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
Memory bandwidth5336 GB/sBetter124 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
740M 8300GAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 9300 GS or Arc A310?+
9300 GS has the higher overall gaming score, while 9300 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
9300 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
9300 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
9300 GS offers more overall performance, while 9300 GS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
9300 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
9300 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
9300 GS leads in combined 1440p performance. 9300 GS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
9300 GS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
9300 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
9300 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 9300 GS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.