Intel
Intel Arc A380 vs Intel Arc 130T
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc 130T
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A380 and Arc 130T across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc 130T outperforms Arc A380 by ~75% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+75%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc A380 (~2%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Arc A380
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider Arc 130T
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · Intel XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
3663
Graphics card ranking
Positions 106–111of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A380
92 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
36
63Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32
52Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
30
49Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
47
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
55Better
54
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speed
Base clock
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequency
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth
Interface
Power consumption
Process node
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc A380 and Arc 130T across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc A380Arc 130T
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
188 FPS
—
1080p Ultra
129 FPS
—
1440p Ultra
69 FPS
—
4K Ultra
23 FPS
—
Counter-Strike 2Arc A380188 FPSArc 130T—Arc A380129 FPSArc 130T—Arc A38069 FPSArc 130T—Arc A38023 FPSArc 130T—
Cyberpunk 2077Arc A380121 FPSArc 130T—Arc A380102 FPSArc 130T—Arc A38050 FPSArc 130T—Arc A38015 FPSArc 130T—
Forza Horizon 5Arc A380153 FPSArc 130T—Arc A38097 FPSArc 130T—Arc A38062 FPSArc 130T—Arc A38034 FPSArc 130T—
Hogwarts LegacyArc A38099 FPSArc 130T—Arc A38081 FPSArc 130T—Arc A38045 FPSArc 130T—Arc A38016 FPSArc 130T—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100366355%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100446539%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100436338%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100600200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100476329%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100466331%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100436338%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100496325%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100436338%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.4Not publicly specified
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSIntel XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe-HPGXe-LPG
Process node6 nmNot publicly specified
Release date2022Q1'25
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count7200 millionNot publicly specified
Die size157 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores1024Better7 Xe cores
Base clock300 MHzNot publicly specified
Boost clock2000 MHzBetterUp to 2.2 GHz (depends on host processor)
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8Integrated into processor package
Length222 mmNot applicable (integrated GPU)
ThicknessDual-slotNot applicable (integrated GPU)
Recommended PSU250 WSystem dependent
Power connector6 pinNot applicable (integrated GPU)
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1 FRL (OEM dependent)
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20 (OEM dependent)
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors44 (platform capability)
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (DisplayPort)
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Shared system memory; OEM configurable
Memory typeGDDR6Shared DDR5 / LPDDR5X
Memory bus96 bitDepends on system memory configuration
TFLOPS4.198Not publicly specified
Other comparisons
GTX 1650 GDDR6NVIDIA
RX 590 GMEAMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 21 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A380 or Arc 130T?+
Arc A380 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A380 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A380 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A380 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A380 offers more overall performance, while Arc A380 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc A380 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A380 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A380 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A380 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A380 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A380 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A380 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A380 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.