Intel
Intel Arc A770 vs Intel Arc Pro B65
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc Pro B65
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A770 and Arc Pro B65 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc A770 outperforms Arc Pro B65 by ~5% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+5%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Partially verifiedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc A770 (~5%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Arc A770
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider Arc Pro B65
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI · Intel XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5559
8198
88100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 41–46of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A770
118 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
55
59Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
46
49Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44
46Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
81
98Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
61
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Memory cache
Upscaling
Clock speedBetter
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAMBetter
Memory frequency
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Die size
Transistor count
Max monitors
Max resolution
Length
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc A770 and Arc Pro B65 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc A770Arc Pro B65
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
228 FPS
—
1080p Ultra
160 FPS
—
1440p Ultra
125 FPS
—
4K Ultra
62 FPS
—
Counter-Strike 2Arc A770228 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A770160 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A770125 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A77062 FPSArc Pro B65—
Cyberpunk 2077Arc A770147 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A770127 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A77090 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A77042 FPSArc Pro B65—
Forza Horizon 5Arc A770186 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A770120 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A770112 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A77091 FPSArc Pro B65—
Hogwarts LegacyArc A770120 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A770101 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A77081 FPSArc Pro B65—Arc A77042 FPSArc Pro B65—
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10055597%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10064663%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10064709%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008810013%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100819819%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100707710%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100687510%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10064709%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100738212%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10065719%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.2DirectX 12 Ultimate
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.6Up to 4.6
UpscalingXeSSIntel XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0 / oneAPI
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe-HPGXe2
Process node6 nmTSMC N5Better
Release date2022Q1'26
Device classDesktopProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count21700 millionNot publicly specified
Die size406 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores4096Better20 Xe cores
Base clock2100 MHzNot publicly specified
Boost clock2400 MHzNot publicly specified
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCI Express 5.0 x16
LengthVaries by boardVaries by board manufacturer
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board manufacturer
Recommended PSU550 WNot publicly specified
Power connector8+8 pinVaries by board manufacturer
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1; board dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0DisplayPort 2.1; board dependent
USB Type-CNoVaries by board manufacturer
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 x 4320@120Hz
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR632 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS19.66Better12.28
Other comparisons
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6XNVIDIA
RX 7600AMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 22 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A770 or Arc Pro B65?+
Arc A770 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A770 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A770 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A770 offers more overall performance, while Arc A770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc A770 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A770 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.