Intel
Intel Arc A770 vs TITAN Xp
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
TITAN Xp
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A770 and TITAN Xp across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc A770 outperforms TITAN Xp by ~10% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+10%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc A770 (~16%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Arc A770
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider TITAN Xp
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5550
8167
9481
8880
Graphics card ranking
Positions 41–46of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A770
118 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
TITAN Xp
Price $162.02Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
55Better
50
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
46Better
42
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44Better
40
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
81Better
67
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
55
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Memory cacheBetter
Upscaling
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
Die sizeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
Length
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc A770 and TITAN Xp across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc A770TITAN Xp
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
228 FPS
204 FPS
1080p Ultra
160 FPS
144 FPS
1440p Ultra
125 FPS
112 FPS
4K Ultra
62 FPS
55 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Arc A770228 FPSTITAN Xp204 FPSArc A770160 FPSTITAN Xp144 FPSArc A770125 FPSTITAN Xp112 FPSArc A77062 FPSTITAN Xp55 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Arc A770147 FPSTITAN Xp132 FPSArc A770127 FPSTITAN Xp114 FPSArc A77090 FPSTITAN Xp81 FPSArc A77042 FPSTITAN Xp37 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Arc A770186 FPSTITAN Xp166 FPSArc A770120 FPSTITAN Xp108 FPSArc A770112 FPSTITAN Xp100 FPSArc A77091 FPSTITAN Xp82 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyArc A770120 FPSTITAN Xp108 FPSArc A770101 FPSTITAN Xp90 FPSArc A77081 FPSTITAN Xp72 FPSArc A77042 FPSTITAN Xp38 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100555010%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100645515%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100645810%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100888010%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100816719%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100706311%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10068629%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100645810%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100736610%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100655910%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe-HPGPascal
Process node6 nmBetter16 nm
Release date20222016
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count21700 millionBetter11800 million
Die size406 mm²Better471 mm²
Shader units / cores4096Better3840
Base clock2100 MHzBetter1480 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter1582 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
LengthVaries by board267 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU550 WBetter600 W
Power connector8+8 pin6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better12 GB GDDR5X
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5X
Memory bus256 bit384 bitBetter
TFLOPS19.66Better12.15
Other comparisons
RX 7600AMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A770 or TITAN Xp?+
Arc A770 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
TITAN Xp is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
TITAN Xp is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A770 offers more overall performance, while Arc A770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
TITAN Xp is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A770 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.