Intel
Intel Arc B570 vs GeForce Go 7700
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce Go 7700
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc B570 and GeForce Go 7700 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc B570 outperforms GeForce Go 7700 by ~62% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+62%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc B570 (~91%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Arc B570
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider GeForce Go 7700
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL 1.x · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4729
9964
7443
Graphics card ranking
Positions 44–49of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc B570
87 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
47Better
29
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40Better
27
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
38Better
25
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
26
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
33
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Interface
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc B570 and GeForce Go 7700 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc B570GeForce Go 7700
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
208 FPS
144 FPS
1080p Ultra
146 FPS
101 FPS
1440p Ultra
114 FPS
54 FPS
4K Ultra
41 FPS
20 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Arc B570208 FPSGeForce Go 7700144 FPSArc B570146 FPSGeForce Go 7700101 FPSArc B570114 FPSGeForce Go 770054 FPSArc B57041 FPSGeForce Go 770020 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Arc B570134 FPSGeForce Go 770093 FPSArc B570116 FPSGeForce Go 770080 FPSArc B57082 FPSGeForce Go 770039 FPSArc B57028 FPSGeForce Go 770013 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Arc B570169 FPSGeForce Go 7700117 FPSArc B570110 FPSGeForce Go 770076 FPSArc B570102 FPSGeForce Go 770049 FPSArc B57061 FPSGeForce Go 770029 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyArc B570110 FPSGeForce Go 770076 FPSArc B57092 FPSGeForce Go 770063 FPSArc B57074 FPSGeForce Go 770035 FPSArc B57028 FPSGeForce Go 770013 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100472947%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100572965%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100553350%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100744353%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100593551%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100583549%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100553350%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100623751%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100553350%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.29.3
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.62.1
UpscalingXeSSNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0CUDA / OpenCL 1.x
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe2-HPGCurie
Process node5 nmBetter80 nm
Release date20252006
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count19600 millionBetter177 million
Die size272 mm²100 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2304Not publicly specified
Base clock2500 MHzBetter450 MHz
Boost clock2500 MHzBetter450 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length272 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU450 WOEM dependent
Power connector8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1aOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1OEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM10 GB GDDR6Better0.5 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3 / DDR2
Memory bus160 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS11.52Not published (legacy architecture)
Other comparisons
RX 7600AMDReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc B570 or GeForce Go 7700?+
Arc B570 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc B570 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce Go 7700 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce Go 7700 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc B570 offers more overall performance, while Arc B570 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce Go 7700 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc B570 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc B570 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc B570 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc B570 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc B570 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc B570 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc B570 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.