Intel
Intel Arc B580 vs Radeon 760M 8600G
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
760M 8600G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc B580 and 760M 8600G across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Arc B580 outperforms 760M 8600G by ~25% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+25%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Intel Arc B580 (~33%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Arc B580
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS 2
Reasons to consider 760M 8600G
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
6048
100100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 7–12of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 760M 8600G
64 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon 760M 8600G
Price $245.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60Better
48
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50Better
41
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47Better
39
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
47
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72Better
54
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
Architecture
Process nodeBetter
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Compute API
Shader units / cores
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
TFLOPSBetter
VRAM
Memory type
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Power consumption—
Power consumption—
Power connector
Recommended PSU
Interface
DisplayPort
HDMI
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Release date
Launch price—
Thickness
Length
Transistor count—
Die size—
Memory cache—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc B580 and 760M 8600G across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc B580760M 8600G
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
197 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
139 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
108 FPS
4K Ultra
—
54 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Arc B580—760M 8600G197 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G139 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G108 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G54 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Arc B580—760M 8600G127 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G110 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G78 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G36 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Arc B580—760M 8600G160 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G104 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G97 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G79 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyArc B580—760M 8600G104 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G87 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G70 FPSArc B580—760M 8600G37 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100604822%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100675618%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100664832%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100800200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100694836%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100684834%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100664832%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100714839%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100664832%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectXDirectX 12 Ultimate12.2
Vulkan1.31.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSS 2FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureXe2Not publicly specified
Process nodeTSMC N54 nmBetter
Release date2024-12-132023
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count—Not publicly specified
Die size—Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores2560Not publicly specified
Base clock2670 MHzBetter800 MHz
Boost clock2670 MHz2800 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8IGP
Length272 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU600 WOEM dependent
Power connector8 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1OEM dependent
DisplayPort3 × DisplayPort 2.1OEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM12 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Memory bus192 bitSystem memory interface
TFLOPS13.67Better5.32
Other comparisons
RTX 4090NVIDIAReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 62
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (1)
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc B580 or 760M 8600G?+
Arc B580 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc B580 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc B580 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc B580 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc B580 offers more overall performance, while Arc B580 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc B580 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc B580 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc B580 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc B580 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc B580 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc B580 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc B580 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc B580 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.