NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon 760M 8600G
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
760M 8600G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 4070 and 760M 8600G across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 4070 outperforms 760M 8600G by ~25% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+25%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 4070 (~17%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 4070
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9 · DLSS 3
Reasons to consider 760M 8600G
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
6048
57100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 13–18of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 4070
76 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon 760M 8600G
Price $245.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60Better
48
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50Better
41
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47Better
39
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
47
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
54
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Length
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4070 and 760M 8600G across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 4070760M 8600G
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
250 FPS
197 FPS
1080p Ultra
176 FPS
139 FPS
1440p Ultra
137 FPS
108 FPS
4K Ultra
64 FPS
54 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 4070250 FPS760M 8600G197 FPSRTX 4070176 FPS760M 8600G139 FPSRTX 4070137 FPS760M 8600G108 FPSRTX 407064 FPS760M 8600G54 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 4070161 FPS760M 8600G127 FPSRTX 4070139 FPS760M 8600G110 FPSRTX 407099 FPS760M 8600G78 FPSRTX 407043 FPS760M 8600G36 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 4070204 FPS760M 8600G160 FPSRTX 4070132 FPS760M 8600G104 FPSRTX 4070123 FPS760M 8600G97 FPSRTX 407094 FPS760M 8600G79 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 4070132 FPS760M 8600G104 FPSRTX 4070110 FPS760M 8600G87 FPSRTX 407089 FPS760M 8600G70 FPSRTX 407044 FPS760M 8600G37 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100604822%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100665616%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100664832%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100800200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001000200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100694836%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100684834%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100664832%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100714839%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100664832%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 3FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureAda LovelaceNot publicly specified
Process node5 nm4 nmBetter
Release date20232023
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count35800 millionNot publicly specified
Die size294 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores5888Not publicly specified
Base clock1920 MHzBetter800 MHz
Boost clock2475 MHz2800 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16IGP
Length240 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU550 WOEM dependent
Power connector16 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM12 GB GDDR6X- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6XSMA
Memory bus192 bitSystem memory interface
TFLOPS29.15Better5.32
Other comparisons
Arc B570IntelReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 65
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4070 or 760M 8600G?+
RTX 4070 has the higher overall gaming score, while 760M 8600G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 4070 offers more overall performance, while RTX 4070 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
760M 8600G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 4070 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4070 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4070 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 4070 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 4070 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 4070 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.