H2H

Intel Arc B770 vs Titan RTX

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc B770 and Titan RTX across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc B770 outperforms Titan RTX by 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+15%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Intel Arc B770 vs Titan RTX: key takeaway

The comparison of Arc B770 and Titan RTX shows a 15% advantage for Arc B770 in gaming performance, while Titan RTX may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
6052
Efficiency
8962
Price / performance
10064
Memory capacity
88100
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Arc B770 is the best overall choice

Arc B770 leads in combined game performance. Arc B770 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE30%

Arc B770 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$425

Arc B770 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 13–18of 317
Arc B770#15position in the GPU ranking
Titan RTXnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Titan RTX

141 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Intel Arc B770

100/100 · Price $549

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Arc B770 and Titan RTX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryArc B770Titan RTX
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60Better
52
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50Better
44
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47Better
41
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
89Better
62
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
73Better
56
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Arc B770 and Titan RTX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationArc B770Titan RTX
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1DisplayPort 1.4a
TFLOPS28Better16.31
USB Type-CNoYes
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Power consumption225 WBetter280 W
Max monitorsVaries by board5
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Recommended PSUVaries by board600 W
LengthVaries by board267 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedTuring
Transistor countNot publicly specified18600 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified754 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified4608
Memory cacheNot publicly specifiedL1 64 KB, L2 6 MB
Launch price$2499
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Clock speed2100 - 2400 MHzBetter1350 - 1770 MHz
Base clock2100 MHzBetter1350 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter1770 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6Better
Memory frequency16 GHzBetter14 GHz
Memory bus256 bit384 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s672 GB/sBetter
Power connector6+8 pin8+8 pin
Release date20262018
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Power consumption225 WBetter280 W
Process node5 nmBetter12 nm
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares Arc B770 and Titan RTX across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

Arc B770Titan RTX
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
29 FPSEstimated 66%
26 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
25 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
16 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
11 FPSEstimated 66%
9 FPSEstimated 66%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongArc B77029 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77025 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77019 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77011 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX9 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneArc B77029 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77025 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77019 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77011 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX9 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2Arc B770248 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX216 FPSEstimated 74%Arc B770174 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX152 FPSEstimated 74%Arc B770135 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX118 FPSEstimated 74%Arc B77067 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX59 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077Arc B770160 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX139 FPSEstimated 74%Arc B770138 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX120 FPSEstimated 74%Arc B77098 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX86 FPSEstimated 74%Arc B77045 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX39 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5Arc B770202 FPSEstimated 80%Titan RTX176 FPSEstimated 80%Arc B770131 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX114 FPSEstimated 74%Arc B770122 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX106 FPSEstimated 74%Arc B77099 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX86 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökArc B77029 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77025 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77019 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77011 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX9 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyArc B770131 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX114 FPSEstimated 74%Arc B770109 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX95 FPSEstimated 74%Arc B77088 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX77 FPSEstimated 74%Arc B77046 FPSEstimated 74%Titan RTX40 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024Arc B77029 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77025 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77019 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77011 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX9 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsArc B77029 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77025 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77019 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77011 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX9 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldArc B77029 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77025 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77019 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX16 FPSEstimated 66%Arc B77011 FPSEstimated 66%Titan RTX9 FPSEstimated 66%
Average FPSArc B77092 FPSTitan RTX80 FPSArc B77070 FPSTitan RTX61 FPSArc B77056 FPSTitan RTX48 FPSArc B77032 FPSTitan RTX28 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Arc B770 and Titan RTX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexArc B770Titan RTXDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100605214%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100676011%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10068655%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008810013%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100896236%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Arc B770 and Titan RTX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexArc B770Titan RTXDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10073741%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10071710%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10068655%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10075784%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10068663%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Arc B770 and Titan RTX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsArc B770Titan RTX
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares Arc B770 and Titan RTX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsArc B770Titan RTX
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedTuring
Process node5 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20262018
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares Arc B770 and Titan RTX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsArc B770Titan RTX
Transistor countNot publicly specified18600 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified754 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified4608
Base clock2100 MHzBetter1350 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHzBetter1770 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares Arc B770 and Titan RTX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsArc B770Titan RTX
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
LengthVaries by board267 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board600 W
Power connector6+8 pin8+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares Arc B770 and Titan RTX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsArc B770Titan RTX
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoYes
Max monitorsVaries by board5
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Arc B770 and Titan RTX with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsArc B770Titan RTX
VRAM16 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit384 bitBetter
TFLOPS28Better16.31
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AArc B77073
Device BTitan RTX56
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Arc B770 or Titan RTX?

Arc B770 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc B770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Titan RTX is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Titan RTX is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Arc B770 offers more overall performance, while Arc B770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Titan RTX is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Arc B770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Arc B770 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc B770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Arc B770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Arc B770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Arc B770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Arc B770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.