H2H

ATI Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5700 XT outperforms ATI Radeon HD 4770 by 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+15%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

ATI Radeon HD 4770 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT: key takeaway

The comparison of ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT shows a 15% advantage for RX 5700 XT in gaming performance, while ATI Radeon HD 4770 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
3945
Efficiency
10067
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
1368
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

ATI Radeon HD 4770 is the best overall choice

ATI Radeon HD 4770 leads in combined game performance. ATI Radeon HD 4770 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE3%

ATI Radeon HD 4770 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$75

ATI Radeon HD 4770 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 96–101of 317
ATI Radeon HD 4770#98position in the GPU ranking
RX 5700 XTnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

ATI Radeon HD 4770

155 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

ATI Radeon HD 4770

100/100 · Price $119

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryATI Radeon HD 4770RX 5700 XT
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
45Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
39Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
67
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
60
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationATI Radeon HD 4770RX 5700 XT
Device classDesktopDesktop
TFLOPS0.969.754Better
Max monitors34
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320
HDMIHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX10.112.1
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
Power consumption80 WBetter225 W
Launch price$119Better$299
Shader units / cores6402560Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Power connector6 pin6+8 pin
Release date20092019
ArchitectureTeraScaleRDNA 1.0
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1OpenCL 2.1
Die size137 mm²Better251 mm²
Memory cacheL1 16 KB, L2 0.13 MBL2 4 MBBetter
Clock speed750 MHz1605 - 1755 MHzBetter
Base clock750 MHz1605 MHzBetter
Boost clock750 MHz1755 MHzBetter
VRAM512 MB GDDR5Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency3,2 GHz14 GHzBetter
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth51 GB/s448 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x16
Power consumption80 WBetter225 W
Process node40 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 WBetter550 W
Length203 mmBetter272 mm
Transistor count826 million10300 millionBetter
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

ATI Radeon HD 4770RX 5700 XT
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 64%
24 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 64%
20 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 58%
15 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
6 FPSEstimated 60%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Call of Duty: WarzoneATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Counter-Strike 2ATI Radeon HD 4770198 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT200 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 4770139 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT140 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 477075 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT109 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 477027 FPSEstimated 62%RX 5700 XT40 FPSEstimated 68%
Cyberpunk 2077ATI Radeon HD 4770128 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT129 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 4770110 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT111 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 477054 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT79 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 477018 FPSEstimated 62%RX 5700 XT27 FPSEstimated 68%
Forza Horizon 5ATI Radeon HD 4770161 FPSEstimated 78%RX 5700 XT163 FPSEstimated 80%ATI Radeon HD 4770104 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 477067 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT98 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 477040 FPSEstimated 62%RX 5700 XT59 FPSEstimated 68%
God of War RagnarökATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Hogwarts LegacyATI Radeon HD 4770104 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 477087 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT88 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 477049 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT71 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 477018 FPSEstimated 62%RX 5700 XT28 FPSEstimated 68%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024ATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Monster Hunter WildsATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
StarfieldATI Radeon HD 477024 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 477010 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 47705 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Average FPSATI Radeon HD 477074 FPSRX 5700 XT74 FPSATI Radeon HD 477056 FPSRX 5700 XT56 FPSATI Radeon HD 477031 FPSRX 5700 XT45 FPSATI Radeon HD 477013 FPSRX 5700 XT19 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexATI Radeon HD 4770RX 5700 XTDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100394514%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100335143%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100325248%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001368136%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006740%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexATI Radeon HD 4770RX 5700 XTDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100275568%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100285463%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100325248%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100245883%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100315251%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 4770RX 5700 XT
DirectX10.112.1
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 1.1OpenCL 2.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 4770RX 5700 XT
ArchitectureTeraScaleRDNA 1.0
Process node40 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20092019
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 4770RX 5700 XT
Transistor count826 million10300 millionBetter
Die size137 mm²Better251 mm²
Shader units / cores6402560Better
Base clock750 MHz1605 MHzBetter
Boost clock750 MHz1755 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 4770RX 5700 XT
InterfacePCIe 2x16PCIe 4x16
Length203 mmBetter272 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU250 WBetter550 W
Power connector6 pin6+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 4770RX 5700 XT
HDMIHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors34
Max resolution2560 × 16007680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares ATI Radeon HD 4770 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsATI Radeon HD 4770RX 5700 XT
VRAM512 MB GDDR5Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.969.754Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AATI Radeon HD 477062
Device BRX 5700 XT60
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 4770 or RX 5700 XT?

ATI Radeon HD 4770 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 4770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

ATI Radeon HD 4770 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

ATI Radeon HD 4770 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

ATI Radeon HD 4770 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 4770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

ATI Radeon HD 4770 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

ATI Radeon HD 4770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

ATI Radeon HD 4770 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 4770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

ATI Radeon HD 4770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

ATI Radeon HD 4770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

ATI Radeon HD 4770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 4770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.