AMD
ATI Radeon HD 2350 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 5700 XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 5700 XT outperforms ATI Radeon HD 2350 by 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+18%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.ATI Radeon HD 2350 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT: key takeaway
The comparison of ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT shows a 18% advantage for RX 5700 XT in gaming performance, while ATI Radeon HD 2350 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3845
10067
100100
768
COMPARISON RESULT
ATI Radeon HD 2350 is the best overall choice
ATI Radeon HD 2350 leads in combined game performance. ATI Radeon HD 2350 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
ATI Radeon HD 2350 leads in the combined performance index
ATI Radeon HD 2350 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 90–95of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
ATI Radeon HD 2350
146 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 2350
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
38
45Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
39Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
67
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
60
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX10.012.1
HDMI—HDMI 2.0b
OpenGL4.44.6
DisplayPort—DisplayPort 1.4a
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolutionVaries by board7680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
Recommended PSUVaries by board550 W
LengthVaries by board272 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedRDNA 1.0
Transistor countNot publicly specified10300 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified251 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified2560
Memory cacheNot publicly specifiedL2 4 MB
Vulkan—1.4
TFLOPS0.0489.754Better
Power consumption20 WBetter225 W
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Power connector—6+8 pin
Release date20072019
Upscaling—FSR
Compute API—OpenCL 2.1
Launch price—$299
Clock speed525 MHz1605 - 1755 MHzBetter
Base clock525 MHz1605 MHzBetter
Boost clock525 MHz1755 MHzBetter
VRAM256 MB DDR2Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency800 MHzBetter14 GHz
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/sBetter448 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 4x16
Power consumption20 WBetter225 W
Process node65 nm7 nmBetter
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
ATI Radeon HD 2350RX 5700 XT
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 64%
24 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
18 FPSEstimated 64%
20 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
11 FPSEstimated 60%
15 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
6 FPSEstimated 60%
Black Myth: WukongATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Call of Duty: WarzoneATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Counter-Strike 2ATI Radeon HD 2350182 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT200 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 2350128 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT140 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235079 FPSEstimated 68%RX 5700 XT109 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235030 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT40 FPSEstimated 68%
Cyberpunk 2077ATI Radeon HD 2350118 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT129 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 2350101 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT111 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235057 FPSEstimated 68%RX 5700 XT79 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT27 FPSEstimated 68%
Forza Horizon 5ATI Radeon HD 2350149 FPSEstimated 78%RX 5700 XT163 FPSEstimated 80%ATI Radeon HD 235096 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235071 FPSEstimated 68%RX 5700 XT98 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235044 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT59 FPSEstimated 68%
God of War RagnarökATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Hogwarts LegacyATI Radeon HD 235096 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235080 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT88 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235051 FPSEstimated 68%RX 5700 XT71 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235021 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT28 FPSEstimated 68%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024ATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Monster Hunter WildsATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
StarfieldATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100384517%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100305152%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100295257%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100768163%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006740%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100245578%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100265470%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100295257%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100215894%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100295257%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX10.012.1
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL4.44.6
Upscaling—FSR
Compute API—OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedRDNA 1.0
Process node65 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20072019
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor countNot publicly specified10300 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified251 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified2560
Base clock525 MHz1605 MHzBetter
Boost clock525 MHz1755 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 1x16PCIe 4x16
LengthVaries by board272 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardDual-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board550 W
Power connector—6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMI—HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPort—DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitorsVaries by board4
Max resolutionVaries by board7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares ATI Radeon HD 2350 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM256 MB DDR2Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS0.0489.754Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: ATI Radeon HD 2350 or RX 5700 XT?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 has the higher overall gaming score, while ATI Radeon HD 2350 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 2350 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 2350 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to ATI Radeon HD 2350 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.