NVIDIA
GeForce 9100M G vs Intel Arc 140V
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Intel Arc 140V
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9100M G and Intel Arc 140V across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce 9100M G outperforms Intel Arc 140V by ~1% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce 9100M G
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL 1.x · Not supported
Reasons to consider Intel Arc 140V
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
IntelPerformance
Price / performance
3838
6565
Graphics card ranking
Positions 100–105of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 9100M G
144 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
38
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
33
33
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
40
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DirectX
OpenGL
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Power consumption——
Architecture
Memory type
Launch price——
Clock speed——
Memory frequency——
Memory bandwidth——
Power consumption——
Process node——
Release date
Device class
Power connector
Compute API
TFLOPS
Base clock
Upscaling
Vulkan
Boost clock
Interface
VRAM
Memory bus
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce 9100M G and Intel Arc 140V across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce 9100M GIntel Arc 140V
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
157 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
111 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
86 FPS
86 FPS
4K Ultra
43 FPS
43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce 9100M G157 FPSIntel Arc 140V157 FPSGeForce 9100M G111 FPSIntel Arc 140V111 FPSGeForce 9100M G86 FPSIntel Arc 140V86 FPSGeForce 9100M G43 FPSIntel Arc 140V43 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce 9100M G102 FPSIntel Arc 140V102 FPSGeForce 9100M G88 FPSIntel Arc 140V88 FPSGeForce 9100M G62 FPSIntel Arc 140V62 FPSGeForce 9100M G29 FPSIntel Arc 140V29 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce 9100M G128 FPSIntel Arc 140V128 FPSGeForce 9100M G83 FPSIntel Arc 140V83 FPSGeForce 9100M G77 FPSIntel Arc 140V77 FPSGeForce 9100M G63 FPSIntel Arc 140V63 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce 9100M G83 FPSIntel Arc 140V83 FPSGeForce 9100M G69 FPSIntel Arc 140V69 FPSGeForce 9100M G56 FPSIntel Arc 140V56 FPSGeForce 9100M G29 FPSIntel Arc 140V29 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10038380%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX10.012.2
VulkanNot supported1.4
OpenGL3.34.6
UpscalingNot supportedXeSS
Compute APICUDA / OpenCL 1.xOpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTeslaXe2 LPG
Process node——
Release date20082024
Device classMobileMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Die sizeNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Shader units / coresNot publicly specifiedNot publicly specified
Base clockOEM/TGP dependentOEM/TGP dependent
Boost clockOEM/TGP dependentOEM/TGP dependent
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfaceOEM platform dependentOEM platform dependent
LengthOEM dependentOEM dependent
ThicknessOEM dependentOEM dependent
Recommended PSUOEM dependentOEM dependent
Power connectorIntegrated laptop powerIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentOEM dependent
DisplayPortOEM dependentOEM dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentOEM dependent
Max monitorsOEM dependentOEM dependent
Max resolutionOEM dependentOEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAMOEM configuration dependentOEM configuration dependent
Memory typeGDDR3 / DDR2Shared LPDDR5X
Memory busOEM configuration dependentOEM configuration dependent
TFLOPSNot published (legacy architecture)OEM/TGP dependent
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 56
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (2)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce 9100M G or Intel Arc 140V?+
GeForce 9100M G has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce 9100M G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 9100M G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 9100M G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce 9100M G offers more overall performance, while GeForce 9100M G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 9100M G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce 9100M G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce 9100M G leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce 9100M G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce 9100M G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 9100M G is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 9100M G is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce 9100M G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.