NVIDIA
GeForce Go 7600 vs GeForce GTX 295
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 295
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce Go 7600 and GTX 295 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GTX 295 outperforms GeForce Go 7600 by ~7% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+7%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce Go 7600 (~14%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce Go 7600
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL 1.x · Not supported
Reasons to consider GTX 295
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
Memory capacity
2931
6452
4343
Graphics card ranking
Positions 349–354of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce Go 7600
149 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
29
31Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
27
29Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
25
26Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
26
36Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
33Better
29
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
DirectX
OpenGL
Power consumption—
Architecture
Memory type
Launch price—
Interface
Die sizeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Power connector
Power consumption—
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Process nodeBetter
Device class
Vulkan
Compute API
Upscaling
TFLOPS
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce Go 7600 and GTX 295 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce Go 7600GTX 295
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
144 FPS
152 FPS
1080p Ultra
101 FPS
107 FPS
1440p Ultra
54 FPS
60 FPS
4K Ultra
20 FPS
23 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce Go 7600144 FPSGTX 295152 FPSGeForce Go 7600101 FPSGTX 295107 FPSGeForce Go 760054 FPSGTX 29560 FPSGeForce Go 760020 FPSGTX 29523 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce Go 760093 FPSGTX 29598 FPSGeForce Go 760080 FPSGTX 29584 FPSGeForce Go 760039 FPSGTX 29543 FPSGeForce Go 760013 FPSGTX 29515 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce Go 7600117 FPSGTX 295124 FPSGeForce Go 760076 FPSGTX 29580 FPSGeForce Go 760049 FPSGTX 29554 FPSGeForce Go 760029 FPSGTX 29533 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce Go 760076 FPSGTX 29580 FPSGeForce Go 760063 FPSGTX 29567 FPSGeForce Go 760035 FPSGTX 29539 FPSGeForce Go 760013 FPSGTX 29515 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10029317%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10029317%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10033343%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10043430%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100036200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10035363%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10035363%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10033343%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10037383%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10033356%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX9.310.0
VulkanNot supportedNot supported
OpenGL2.13.3
UpscalingNot supportedNot supported
Compute APICUDA / OpenCL 1.xOpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.3
Architecture and release
ArchitectureCurieTesla 2.0
Process node90 nm55 nmBetter
Release date20062009
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count177 million1400 millionBetter
Die size125 mm²Better470 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified240
Base clock450 MHz576 MHzBetter
Boost clock450 MHz576 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2x16
LengthOEM dependent267 mm
ThicknessOEM dependentDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent600 W
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI
DisplayPortOEM dependentBoard dependent
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent3
Max resolutionOEM dependent2560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM0.25 GB GDDR31,75 GB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR3 / DDR2GDDR3
Memory bus128 bit448x2 bitBetter
TFLOPSNot published (legacy architecture)0.596
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 67
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce Go 7600 or GTX 295?+
GeForce Go 7600 has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce Go 7600 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce Go 7600 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce Go 7600 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce Go 7600 offers more overall performance, while GeForce Go 7600 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce Go 7600 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce Go 7600 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce Go 7600 leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce Go 7600 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce Go 7600 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 295 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 295 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce Go 7600 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.