NVIDIA
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 5700 XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce MX350 and RX 5700 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 5700 XT outperforms GeForce MX350 by ~45% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+45%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce MX350
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Reasons to consider RX 5700 XT
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3145
10067
5440
5668
Graphics card ranking
Positions 148–153of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce MX350
165 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
31
45Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
39Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
26
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
67
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
43
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Release date
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Power connector
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Transistor countBetter
Device class
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce MX350 and RX 5700 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce MX350RX 5700 XT
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
155 FPS
200 FPS
1080p Ultra
109 FPS
140 FPS
1440p Ultra
58 FPS
109 FPS
4K Ultra
21 FPS
40 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce MX350155 FPSRX 5700 XT200 FPSGeForce MX350109 FPSRX 5700 XT140 FPSGeForce MX35058 FPSRX 5700 XT109 FPSGeForce MX35021 FPSRX 5700 XT40 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce MX350100 FPSRX 5700 XT129 FPSGeForce MX35086 FPSRX 5700 XT111 FPSGeForce MX35042 FPSRX 5700 XT79 FPSGeForce MX35014 FPSRX 5700 XT27 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce MX350126 FPSRX 5700 XT163 FPSGeForce MX35082 FPSRX 5700 XT105 FPSGeForce MX35052 FPSRX 5700 XT98 FPSGeForce MX35031 FPSRX 5700 XT59 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce MX35082 FPSRX 5700 XT105 FPSGeForce MX35068 FPSRX 5700 XT88 FPSGeForce MX35038 FPSRX 5700 XT71 FPSGeForce MX35014 FPSRX 5700 XT28 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100314537%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100355137%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100385231%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100566819%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006740%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100425527%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100415427%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100385231%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100455825%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100385231%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.112.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 6.1OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePascal / Turing / AmpereRDNA 1.0
Process node14 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20202019
Device classMobileDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count3300 million10300 millionBetter
Die size132 mm²Better251 mm²
Shader units / cores6402560Better
Base clock747 MHz1605 MHzBetter
Boost clock937 MHz1755 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4x16
LengthOEM dependent272 mm
ThicknessOEM dependentDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent550 W
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent4
Max resolutionOEM dependent7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM2 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5 / GDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus64 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS1.1999.754Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce MX350 or RX 5700 XT?+
GeForce MX350 has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce MX350 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce MX350 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce MX350 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce MX350 offers more overall performance, while GeForce MX350 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce MX350 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce MX350 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce MX350 leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce MX350 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce MX350 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce MX350 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce MX350 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce MX350 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.