AMD
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce 510M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 510M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 5700 XT and GeForce 510M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 5700 XT outperforms GeForce 510M by ~18% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+18%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 5700 XT (~8%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 5700 XT
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Reasons to consider GeForce 510M
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
4538
4065
Graphics card ranking
Positions 113–118of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
72 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
45Better
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
39Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
67Better
33
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
43Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Clock speed—
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAM
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 5700 XT and GeForce 510M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 5700 XTGeForce 510M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
200 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
140 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
109 FPS
86 FPS
4K Ultra
40 FPS
43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 5700 XT200 FPSGeForce 510M157 FPSRX 5700 XT140 FPSGeForce 510M111 FPSRX 5700 XT109 FPSGeForce 510M86 FPSRX 5700 XT40 FPSGeForce 510M43 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 5700 XT129 FPSGeForce 510M102 FPSRX 5700 XT111 FPSGeForce 510M88 FPSRX 5700 XT79 FPSGeForce 510M62 FPSRX 5700 XT27 FPSGeForce 510M29 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 5700 XT163 FPSGeForce 510M128 FPSRX 5700 XT105 FPSGeForce 510M83 FPSRX 5700 XT98 FPSGeForce 510M77 FPSRX 5700 XT59 FPSGeForce 510M63 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 5700 XT105 FPSGeForce 510M83 FPSRX 5700 XT88 FPSGeForce 510M69 FPSRX 5700 XT71 FPSGeForce 510M56 FPSRX 5700 XT28 FPSGeForce 510M29 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100453817%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100513829%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100523831%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100680200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100670200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100553837%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100543835%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100523831%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100583842%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100523831%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.111.0
Vulkan1.4Vulkan 1.2 (driver support)
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1CUDA / OpenCL
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0Fermi
Process node7 nmBetterTSMC 40 nm
Release date20192011
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count10300 millionNot publicly specified
Die size251 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores2560Not publicly specified
Base clock1605 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Boost clock1755 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16OEM platform dependent
Length272 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU550 WOEM dependent
Power connector6+8 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0bOEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6OEM configuration dependent
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus256 bitOEM configuration dependent
TFLOPS9.754OEM/TGP dependent
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 64
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 5700 XT or GeForce 510M?+
RX 5700 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce 510M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 510M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 510M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 5700 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 5700 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 510M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce 510M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 5700 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 5700 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 5700 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 5700 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 5700 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 5700 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.