NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6800
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Pro W6800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and Pro W6800 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile outperforms Pro W6800 by ~1% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · DLSS 2
Reasons to consider Pro W6800
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4354
10072
5951
68100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 16–21of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
68 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
43
54Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37
45Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
35
43Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
72
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Release date
Upscaling
HDMI
DisplayPort
Max resolution
Max monitors
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Architecture
Memory type
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Interface
Power connector
Thickness
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Device class
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and Pro W6800 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GeForce RTX 2070 MobilePro W6800
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
190 FPS
221 FPS
1080p Ultra
134 FPS
155 FPS
1440p Ultra
104 FPS
121 FPS
4K Ultra
38 FPS
60 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile190 FPSPro W6800221 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile134 FPSPro W6800155 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile104 FPSPro W6800121 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile38 FPSPro W680060 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile123 FPSPro W6800143 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile106 FPSPro W6800123 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile75 FPSPro W680088 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile26 FPSPro W680040 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile155 FPSPro W6800180 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile100 FPSPro W6800117 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile94 FPSPro W6800109 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile57 FPSPro W680088 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile100 FPSPro W6800117 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile84 FPSPro W680097 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile67 FPSPro W680078 FPSGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile26 FPSPro W680041 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100435423%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100486429%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100506729%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1006810038%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007233%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100547533%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100537230%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100506729%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100577932%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100516829%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2.0
Process node12 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20192021
Device classMobileProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count10800 million26800 millionBetter
Die size445 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores23043840Better
Base clock1215 MHz2075 MHzBetter
Boost clock1440 MHz2320 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4x16
LengthOEM dependent267 mm
ThicknessMXM ModuleDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent600 W
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent6
Max resolutionDepends on host system7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR632 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS6.63617.83Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile or Pro W6800?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile offers more overall performance, while GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile leads in combined 1440p performance. GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.