Intel
Intel Iris Xe DG1 vs Radeon Pro W6800
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Pro W6800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Xe DG1 and Pro W6800 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Iris Xe DG1 outperforms Pro W6800 by ~1% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Equal catalog scores
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Iris Xe DG1
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Reasons to consider Pro W6800
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3254
10072
10051
50100
Graphics card ranking
Positions 57–62of 411
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Iris Xe DG1
170 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Iris Xe DG1
Price $185.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
54Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
45Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
43Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
72
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Device class
HDMI
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
DisplayPort
Max monitors
Max resolution
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Release date
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Memory cache
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Power connector
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Iris Xe DG1 and Pro W6800 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Iris Xe DG1Pro W6800
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
163 FPS
221 FPS
1080p Ultra
115 FPS
155 FPS
1440p Ultra
62 FPS
121 FPS
4K Ultra
22 FPS
60 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Iris Xe DG1163 FPSPro W6800221 FPSIris Xe DG1115 FPSPro W6800155 FPSIris Xe DG162 FPSPro W6800121 FPSIris Xe DG122 FPSPro W680060 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Iris Xe DG1105 FPSPro W6800143 FPSIris Xe DG191 FPSPro W6800123 FPSIris Xe DG145 FPSPro W680088 FPSIris Xe DG115 FPSPro W680040 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Iris Xe DG1133 FPSPro W6800180 FPSIris Xe DG186 FPSPro W6800117 FPSIris Xe DG156 FPSPro W6800109 FPSIris Xe DG133 FPSPro W680088 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyIris Xe DG186 FPSPro W6800117 FPSIris Xe DG172 FPSPro W680097 FPSIris Xe DG140 FPSPro W680078 FPSIris Xe DG115 FPSPro W680041 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100325451%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100386451%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100376758%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1005010067%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007233%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100407561%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100397259%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100376758%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100427961%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100376859%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSSFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedRDNA 2.0
Process node10 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20222021
Device classMobileProf
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified26800 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified520 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified3840
Base clock900 MHz2075 MHzBetter
Boost clock1650 MHz2320 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
LengthOEM dependent267 mm
ThicknessOEM dependentDual-slot
Recommended PSUOEM dependent600 W
Power connectorIntegrated laptop power6+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIOEM dependentHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortOEM dependentDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-COEM dependentNo
Max monitorsOEM dependent6
Max resolutionOEM dependent7680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB LPDDR4X32 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS2.5317.83Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (5)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (2)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Iris Xe DG1 or Pro W6800?+
Iris Xe DG1 has the higher overall gaming score, while Iris Xe DG1 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Iris Xe DG1 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Iris Xe DG1 offers more overall performance, while Iris Xe DG1 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Iris Xe DG1 leads in combined 1440p performance. Iris Xe DG1 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Iris Xe DG1 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Iris Xe DG1 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Iris Xe DG1 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.