NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX 1650 SUPER and Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗GTX 1650 SUPER outperforms Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics by ~16% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+16%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER (~7%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider GTX 1650 SUPER
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · NVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)
Reasons to consider Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · XeSS
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3732
100100
5155
6050
Graphics card ranking
Positions 97–102of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
172 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
37Better
32
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
33Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31Better
27
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
46Better
43
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
OpenGL
DirectX
Vulkan
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAM
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
Length
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / coresBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor count
Upscaling
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX 1650 SUPERIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
187 FPS
160 FPS
1080p Ultra
131 FPS
113 FPS
1440p Ultra
73 FPS
61 FPS
4K Ultra
23 FPS
22 FPS
Counter-Strike 2GTX 1650 SUPER187 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics160 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER131 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics113 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER73 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics61 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER23 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics22 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 1650 SUPER121 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics103 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER104 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics89 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER53 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics44 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER15 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics15 FPS
Forza Horizon 5GTX 1650 SUPER152 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics130 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER99 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics84 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER66 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics55 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER34 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics32 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 1650 SUPER99 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics84 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER82 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics71 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER48 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics39 FPSGTX 1650 SUPER16 FPSIntel Iris Xe MAX Graphics15 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100373214%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100443815%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100443717%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100605018%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100484018%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100463916%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100443717%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100504217%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100443717%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.112.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNVIDIA Image Scaling (NIS)XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTuringXe LP
Process node12 nm10 nmBetter
Release date20192020
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count6600 millionNot publicly specified
Die size284 mm²95 mm²Better
Shader units / cores1280Better768
Base clock1530 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock1725 MHzBetter1650 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU300 W200 WBetter
Power connector6 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM4 GB GDDR64 GB LPDDR4X
Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR4X
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS4.416Better2.534
Other comparisons
GTX 1650 SUPERNVIDIAVSRTX 2070NVIDIAOpen comparisonGTX 1650 SUPERNVIDIAVS
RX 5600 XTAMDOpen comparisonRTX 2060NVIDIAVSGTX 1650 SUPERNVIDIAOpen comparisonGTX 1650 SUPERNVIDIAVSRX 5700 XTAMDOpen comparisonRTX 2060 SUPERNVIDIAVSGTX 1650 SUPERNVIDIAOpen comparisonRX 6800AMDVSGTX 1650 SUPERNVIDIAOpen comparisonReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 69
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1650 SUPER or Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics?+
GTX 1650 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1650 SUPER offers more overall performance, while GTX 1650 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1650 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1650 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1650 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.