NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 590 GME
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 590 GME
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 590 GME outperforms GTX 1650 SUPER by 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+11%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 590 GME: key takeaway
The comparison of GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME shows a 11% advantage for RX 590 GME in gaming performance, while GTX 1650 SUPER may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3741
10078
100100
6068
COMPARISON RESULT
GTX 1650 SUPER is the best overall choice
GTX 1650 SUPER leads in combined game performance. GTX 1650 SUPER offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
GTX 1650 SUPER leads in the combined performance index
GTX 1650 SUPER costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 123–128of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
172 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
100/100 · Price $229The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
37
41Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
33
36Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31
34Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
78
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
59
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.0b
Device classDesktopDesktop
Max monitors34
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
OpenGL4.64.6
DirectX12.112.0
Vulkan1.41.3
TFLOPS4.4166.543Better
Power consumption100 WBetter175 W
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Clock speed1530 - 1725 MHzBetter1257 - 1380 MHz
Base clock1530 MHzBetter1257 MHz
Boost clock1725 MHzBetter1380 MHz
VRAM4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR5Better
Memory frequency12 GHzBetter8 GHz
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Power connector6 pin8 pin
Release date20192020
ArchitectureTuringGCN 4.0
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Upscaling—FSR
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s256 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Power consumption100 WBetter175 W
Process node12 nmBetter14 nm
Recommended PSU300 WBetter450 W
Length229 mmBetter241 mm
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$229$229
Shader units / cores12802304Better
Die size284 mm²232 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 1 MBL1 16 KB, L2 2 MB
Transistor count6600 millionBetter5700 million
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX 1650 SUPERRX 590 GME
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 60%
13 FPSEstimated 64%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 57%
Black Myth: WukongGTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%
Call of Duty: WarzoneGTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%
Counter-Strike 2GTX 1650 SUPER187 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590 GME189 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER131 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590 GME133 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER73 FPSEstimated 68%RX 590 GME96 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1650 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 62%RX 590 GME31 FPSEstimated 65%
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 1650 SUPER121 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590 GME122 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER104 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590 GME105 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER53 FPSEstimated 68%RX 590 GME70 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1650 SUPER15 FPSEstimated 62%RX 590 GME21 FPSEstimated 65%
Forza Horizon 5GTX 1650 SUPER152 FPSEstimated 80%RX 590 GME154 FPSEstimated 80%GTX 1650 SUPER99 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590 GME100 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER66 FPSEstimated 68%RX 590 GME86 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1650 SUPER34 FPSEstimated 62%RX 590 GME46 FPSEstimated 65%
God of War RagnarökGTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 1650 SUPER99 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590 GME100 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER82 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590 GME84 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650 SUPER48 FPSEstimated 68%RX 590 GME62 FPSEstimated 72%GTX 1650 SUPER16 FPSEstimated 62%RX 590 GME21 FPSEstimated 65%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024GTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%
Monster Hunter WildsGTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%
StarfieldGTX 1650 SUPER22 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1650 SUPER10 FPSEstimated 60%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%GTX 1650 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 55%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100374110%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10044464%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100444911%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100606813%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007825%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100485310%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100465212%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100444911%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100505611%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100444911%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.112.0
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling—FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureTuringGCN 4.0
Process node12 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20192020
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count6600 millionBetter5700 million
Die size284 mm²232 mm²Better
Shader units / cores12802304Better
Base clock1530 MHzBetter1257 MHz
Boost clock1725 MHzBetter1380 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Length229 mmBetter241 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU300 WBetter450 W
Power connector6 pin8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors34
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 590 GME with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR5Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS4.4166.543Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1650 SUPER or RX 590 GME?+
GTX 1650 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1650 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1650 SUPER offers more overall performance, while GTX 1650 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1650 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1650 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1650 SUPER is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1650 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.