NVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6900 XT
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 6900 XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6900 XT outperforms GTX 1660 SUPER by 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+43%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6900 XT: key takeaway
The comparison of GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT shows a 43% advantage for RX 6900 XT in gaming performance, while GTX 1660 SUPER may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4057
10063
10083
6088
COMPARISON RESULT
The devices received the same overall score
GTX 1660 SUPER leads in combined game performance. GTX 1660 SUPER offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
GTX 1660 SUPER costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 68–73of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
179 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
100/100 · Price $229The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
40
57Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
35
47Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
33
45Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
63
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63
63
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
Max monitors34
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoYes
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS5.02723.04Better
Power consumption125 WBetter300 W
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Clock speed1530 - 1785 MHz1825 - 2250 MHzBetter
Base clock1530 MHz1825 MHzBetter
Boost clock1785 MHz2250 MHzBetter
VRAM6 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6Better
Power connector8 pin8+8 pin
Release date20192020
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2.0
Memory frequency14 GHz16 GHzBetter
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth336 GB/s512 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4x16
Power consumption125 WBetter300 W
Process node12 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU300 WBetter700 W
Length229 mmBetter267 mm
ThicknessDual-slotTriple-slot
Upscaling—FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$229Better$999
Shader units / cores14085120Better
Die size284 mm²Better520 mm²
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 1.5 MBL1 128 KB, L2 4 MB
Transistor count6600 million26800 millionBetter
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
GTX 1660 SUPERRX 6900 XT
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 66%
28 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
24 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
13 FPSEstimated 63%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
10 FPSEstimated 66%
Black Myth: WukongGTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneGTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2GTX 1660 SUPER190 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT233 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 SUPER133 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT164 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 SUPER91 FPSEstimated 71%RX 6900 XT127 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 SUPER28 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT63 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 1660 SUPER122 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT150 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 SUPER105 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT129 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 SUPER66 FPSEstimated 71%RX 6900 XT92 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT42 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5GTX 1660 SUPER154 FPSEstimated 80%RX 6900 XT189 FPSEstimated 80%GTX 1660 SUPER100 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT123 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 SUPER82 FPSEstimated 71%RX 6900 XT114 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 SUPER41 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT93 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökGTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 1660 SUPER100 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT123 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 SUPER84 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT103 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 SUPER59 FPSEstimated 71%RX 6900 XT83 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 64%RX 6900 XT43 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024GTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsGTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldGTX 1660 SUPER23 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER19 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER13 FPSEstimated 63%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 1660 SUPER5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100405735%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100466433%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100466636%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100608838%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006345%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100497137%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100486936%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100466636%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100517437%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100466636%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling—FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2.0
Process node12 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20192020
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count6600 million26800 millionBetter
Die size284 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores14085120Better
Base clock1530 MHz1825 MHzBetter
Boost clock1785 MHz2250 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4x16
Length229 mmBetter267 mm
ThicknessDual-slotTriple-slot
Recommended PSU300 WBetter700 W
Power connector8 pin8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoYes
Max monitors34
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares GTX 1660 SUPER and RX 6900 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM6 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS5.02723.04Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1660 SUPER or RX 6900 XT?+
GTX 1660 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1660 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1660 SUPER offers more overall performance, while GTX 1660 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1660 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1660 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1660 SUPER is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1660 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.