AMD
Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 1660
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6900 XT outperforms GTX 1660 by 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+50%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 shows a 50% advantage for RX 6900 XT in gaming performance, while GTX 1660 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5738
63100
83100
8860
COMPARISON RESULT
RX 6900 XT is the best overall choice
RX 6900 XT leads in combined game performance. GTX 1660 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 6900 XT leads in the combined performance index
GTX 1660 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 68–73of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6900 XT
133 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1660
100/100 · Price $229The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
57Better
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
47Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
45Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
63
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
62
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSR—
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS23.04Better5.027
Power consumption300 W120 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Power connector8+8 pin8 pin
Release date20202019
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Turing
ThicknessTriple-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Launch price$999$229Better
Shader units / cores5120Better1408
Clock speed1825 - 2250 MHzBetter1530 - 1785 MHz
Base clock1825 MHzBetter1530 MHz
Boost clock2250 MHzBetter1785 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR5
Memory frequency16 GHzBetter8 GHz
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sBetter192 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Power consumption300 W120 WBetter
Process node7 nmBetter12 nm
Recommended PSU700 W300 WBetter
Length267 mm229 mmBetter
Die size520 mm²284 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 4 MBL1 64 KB, L2 1.5 MB
Transistor count26800 millionBetter6600 million
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CYesNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 6900 XTGTX 1660
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
28 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
24 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
18 FPSEstimated 66%
11 FPSEstimated 60%
4K Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongRX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 6900 XT233 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660189 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT164 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660133 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT127 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166077 FPSEstimated 68%RX 6900 XT63 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166024 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6900 XT150 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660122 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT129 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660105 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT92 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166056 FPSEstimated 68%RX 6900 XT42 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166016 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5RX 6900 XT189 FPSEstimated 80%GTX 1660154 FPSEstimated 80%RX 6900 XT123 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166099 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT114 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166069 FPSEstimated 68%RX 6900 XT93 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166036 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökRX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6900 XT123 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166099 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT103 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166083 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6900 XT83 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166050 FPSEstimated 68%RX 6900 XT43 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166017 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 6900 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6900 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 6900 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100573840%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100644535%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100664440%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100886038%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006310045%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100714839%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100694738%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100664440%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100745039%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100664538%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSR—
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Turing
Process node7 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20202019
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count26800 millionBetter6600 million
Die size520 mm²284 mm²Better
Shader units / cores5120Better1408
Base clock1825 MHzBetter1530 MHz
Boost clock2250 MHzBetter1785 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Length267 mm229 mmBetter
ThicknessTriple-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU700 W300 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pin8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 6900 XT and GTX 1660 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
TFLOPS23.04Better5.027
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310IntelReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 6900 XT or GTX 1660?+
RX 6900 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1660 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1660 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1660 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 6900 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 6900 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1660 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1660 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 6900 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6900 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 6900 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1660 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1660 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 6900 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.