H2H

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5700 XT outperforms GTX 1660 by 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+18%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Radeon RX 5700 XT: key takeaway

The comparison of GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT shows a 18% advantage for RX 5700 XT in gaming performance, while GTX 1660 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
3845
Efficiency
10067
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
6068
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

GTX 1660 is the best overall choice

GTX 1660 leads in combined game performance. GTX 1660 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE3%

GTX 1660 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$25

GTX 1660 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 105–110of 317
GTX 1660not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
RX 5700 XTnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce GTX 1660

75 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce GTX 1660

100/100 · Price $229

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryGTX 1660RX 5700 XT
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
38
45Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
39Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
67
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
60
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationGTX 1660RX 5700 XT
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.0b
Device classDesktopDesktop
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.112.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS5.0279.754Better
Power consumption120 WBetter225 W
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Clock speed1530 - 1785 MHz1605 - 1755 MHzBetter
Base clock1530 MHz1605 MHzBetter
Max monitors34
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Boost clock1785 MHzBetter1755 MHz
VRAM6 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR6Better
Power connector8 pin6+8 pin
Release date20192019
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 1.0
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Memory frequency8 GHz14 GHzBetter
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s448 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4x16
Power consumption120 WBetter225 W
Process node12 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU300 WBetter550 W
Length229 mmBetter272 mm
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$229Better$299
Shader units / cores14082560Better
Die size284 mm²251 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 1.5 MBL2 4 MBBetter
Transistor count6600 million10300 millionBetter
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

GTX 1660RX 5700 XT
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
24 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
11 FPSEstimated 60%
15 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
6 FPSEstimated 60%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongGTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Call of Duty: WarzoneGTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Counter-Strike 2GTX 1660189 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT200 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660133 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT140 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166077 FPSEstimated 68%RX 5700 XT109 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166024 FPSEstimated 62%RX 5700 XT40 FPSEstimated 68%
Cyberpunk 2077GTX 1660122 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT129 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1660105 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT111 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166056 FPSEstimated 68%RX 5700 XT79 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166016 FPSEstimated 62%RX 5700 XT27 FPSEstimated 68%
Forza Horizon 5GTX 1660154 FPSEstimated 80%RX 5700 XT163 FPSEstimated 80%GTX 166099 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166069 FPSEstimated 68%RX 5700 XT98 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166036 FPSEstimated 62%RX 5700 XT59 FPSEstimated 68%
God of War RagnarökGTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Hogwarts LegacyGTX 166099 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166083 FPSEstimated 74%RX 5700 XT88 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166050 FPSEstimated 68%RX 5700 XT71 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 166017 FPSEstimated 62%RX 5700 XT28 FPSEstimated 68%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024GTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Monster Hunter WildsGTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
StarfieldGTX 166022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 166011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16605 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%
Average FPSGTX 166070 FPSRX 5700 XT74 FPSGTX 166053 FPSRX 5700 XT56 FPSGTX 166032 FPSRX 5700 XT45 FPSGTX 166012 FPSRX 5700 XT19 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexGTX 1660RX 5700 XTDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100384517%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100455113%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100445217%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100606813%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006740%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexGTX 1660RX 5700 XTDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100485514%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100475414%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100445217%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100505815%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100455214%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsGTX 1660RX 5700 XT
DirectX12.112.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsGTX 1660RX 5700 XT
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 1.0
Process node12 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20192019
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsGTX 1660RX 5700 XT
Transistor count6600 million10300 millionBetter
Die size284 mm²251 mm²Better
Shader units / cores14082560Better
Base clock1530 MHz1605 MHzBetter
Boost clock1785 MHzBetter1755 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsGTX 1660RX 5700 XT
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4x16
Length229 mmBetter272 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU300 WBetter550 W
Power connector8 pin6+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsGTX 1660RX 5700 XT
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors34
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares GTX 1660 and RX 5700 XT with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsGTX 1660RX 5700 XT
VRAM6 GB GDDR58 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS5.0279.754Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AGTX 166062
Device BRX 5700 XT60
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1660 or RX 5700 XT?

GTX 1660 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1660 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

GTX 1660 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

GTX 1660 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

GTX 1660 offers more overall performance, while GTX 1660 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

GTX 1660 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

GTX 1660 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

GTX 1660 leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1660 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

GTX 1660 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

GTX 1660 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

GTX 1660 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to GTX 1660 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.