H2H

Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5700 XT outperforms GTX 1650 by 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+36%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 shows a 36% advantage for RX 5700 XT in gaming performance, while GTX 1650 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4533
Efficiency
67100
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
6856
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RX 5700 XT is the best overall choice

RX 5700 XT leads in combined game performance. RX 5700 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE3%

RX 5700 XT leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$45

GTX 1650 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 145–150of 317
RX 5700 XTnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
GTX 1650not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce GTX 1650

146 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce GTX 1650

100/100 · Price $169

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 5700 XTGTX 1650
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
45Better
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
39Better
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
67
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60Better
58
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 5700 XTGTX 1650
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.0
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSR
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.112.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS9.754Better2.984
Power consumption225 W75 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Power connector6+8 pinNone
Release date20192019
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0Turing
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Launch price$299$169Better
Shader units / cores2560Better896
Clock speed1605 - 1755 MHzBetter1485 - 1665 MHz
Base clock1605 MHzBetter1485 MHz
Boost clock1755 MHzBetter1665 MHz
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR5
Memory frequency14 GHzBetter8 GHz
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth448 GB/sBetter128 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Power consumption225 W75 WBetter
Process node7 nmBetter12 nm
Recommended PSU550 W250 WBetter
Length272 mm229 mmBetter
Die size251 mm²200 mm²Better
Memory cacheL2 4 MBBetterL1 64 KB, L2 1 MB
Transistor count10300 millionBetter4700 million
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 5700 XTGTX 1650
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 66%
17 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
15 FPSEstimated 66%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
6 FPSEstimated 60%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 5700 XT200 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650169 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT140 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650116 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT109 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 165064 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT40 FPSEstimated 68%GTX 165022 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 5700 XT129 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 1650109 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT111 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 165092 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT79 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 165046 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT27 FPSEstimated 68%GTX 165015 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5RX 5700 XT163 FPSEstimated 80%GTX 1650138 FPSEstimated 78%RX 5700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 165087 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT98 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 165057 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT59 FPSEstimated 68%GTX 165033 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökRX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 5700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 165089 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT88 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 165073 FPSEstimated 72%RX 5700 XT71 FPSEstimated 74%GTX 165041 FPSEstimated 66%RX 5700 XT28 FPSEstimated 68%GTX 165015 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 5700 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 165017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 5700 XT15 FPSEstimated 66%GTX 16509 FPSEstimated 58%RX 5700 XT6 FPSEstimated 60%GTX 16505 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSRX 5700 XT74 FPSGTX 165063 FPSRX 5700 XT56 FPSGTX 165047 FPSRX 5700 XT45 FPSGTX 165026 FPSRX 5700 XT19 FPSGTX 165012 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 5700 XTGTX 1650Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100453331%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100514024%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100523929%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100685619%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006710040%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 5700 XTGTX 1650Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100554324%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100544225%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100523929%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100584525%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100524026%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 5700 XTGTX 1650
DirectX12.112.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 5700 XTGTX 1650
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0Turing
Process node7 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20192019
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 5700 XTGTX 1650
Transistor count10300 millionBetter4700 million
Die size251 mm²200 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2560Better896
Base clock1605 MHzBetter1485 MHz
Boost clock1755 MHzBetter1665 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 5700 XTGTX 1650
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Length272 mm229 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU550 W250 WBetter
Power connector6+8 pinNone

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 5700 XTGTX 1650
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.0
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 5700 XT and GTX 1650 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 5700 XTGTX 1650
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
TFLOPS9.754Better2.984
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 5700 XT60
Device BGTX 165058
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 5700 XT or GTX 1650?

RX 5700 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 5700 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

GTX 1650 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

GTX 1650 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 5700 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 5700 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

GTX 1650 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 5700 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 5700 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 5700 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 5700 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

GTX 1650 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

GTX 1650 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 5700 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.