NVIDIA
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 6950 XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro P6000 and RX 6950 XT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗Quadro P6000 outperforms RX 6950 XT by ~4% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+4%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 16Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider Quadro P6000
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL · No dedicated hardware upscaling (DLSS unsupported)
Reasons to consider RX 6950 XT
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5957
7957
2745
10088
Graphics card ranking
Positions 25–30of 30
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
NVIDIA Quadro P6000
161 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
59Better
57
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
49Better
47
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46Better
45
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
79Better
57
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
50
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
Interface
Memory busBetter
Memory type
Architecture
Device class
Process nodeBetter
Release date
VRAMBetter
Power consumptionBetter
HDMI
Vulkan
Compute API
TFLOPSBetter
Boost clockBetter
Length
Recommended PSUBetter
USB Type-C
Max monitors
DirectX
OpenGL
Upscaling
Transistor countBetter
Die sizeBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Max resolution
Base clockBetter
Thickness
Power connector
Power consumption—
Launch price—
Clock speed—
Memory frequency—
Memory bandwidth—
Memory cache—
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Quadro P6000 and RX 6950 XT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Quadro P6000RX 6950 XT
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
—
234 FPS
1080p Ultra
—
165 FPS
1440p Ultra
—
128 FPS
4K Ultra
—
64 FPS
Counter-Strike 2Quadro P6000—RX 6950 XT234 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT165 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT128 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT64 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077Quadro P6000—RX 6950 XT151 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT130 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT93 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT43 FPS
Forza Horizon 5Quadro P6000—RX 6950 XT191 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT124 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT115 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT94 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT124 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT103 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT83 FPSQuadro P6000—RX 6950 XT43 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10059573%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10065650%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10070666%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1001008813%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100795732%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10077718%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10075698%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10070666%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100827410%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10071667%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12 (feature level 12_1)12.2
VulkanVulkan 1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingNo dedicated hardware upscaling (DLSS unsupported)FSR
Compute APICUDA / OpenCLOpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitecturePascalRDNA 2.0
Process node16 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20162022
Device classProfDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count11.8 billion26800 millionBetter
Die size471 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / cores3840 CUDA cores5120Better
Base clock1506 MHz1925 MHzBetter
Boost clock1645 MHz2324 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Length267 mm267 mm
ThicknessDual-slotTriple-slot
Recommended PSU600 WBetter700 W
Power connector1× 8-pin PCIe8+8 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMI0 native (DisplayPort adapter supported)HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNot supportedNo
Max monitors4 simultaneous displays3
Max resolution7680×4320 at 30 Hz via DisplayPort 1.47680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM24 GBBetter16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Memory bus384-bitBetter256 bit
TFLOPS12.023.65Better
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 16
- Specifications
- 0 / 64
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Quadro P6000 or RX 6950 XT?+
Quadro P6000 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6950 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Quadro P6000 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Quadro P6000 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Quadro P6000 offers more overall performance, while Quadro P6000 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Quadro P6000 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 6950 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Quadro P6000 leads in combined 1440p performance. Quadro P6000 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Quadro P6000 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 6950 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 6950 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Quadro P6000 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.