AMD
Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Radeon Vega 11CU 2400G
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
Vega 11CU 2400G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6950 XT outperforms Vega 11CU 2400G by 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+33%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon RX 6950 XT vs Radeon Vega 11CU 2400G: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G shows a 33% advantage for RX 6950 XT in gaming performance, while Vega 11CU 2400G may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Price / performance
5743
69100
COMPARISON RESULT
RX 6950 XT is the best overall choice
RX 6950 XT leads in combined game performance. Vega 11CU 2400G offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 6950 XT leads in the combined performance index
Vega 11CU 2400G costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 147–152of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6950 XT
111 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Vega 11CU 2400G
100/100 · Price $119The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
57Better
43
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
47Better
37
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
45Better
35
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
57Better
50
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59Better
57
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0b
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSR—
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS23.65Better1.76
Power consumption335 W—
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Power connector8+8 pin—
Release date20222018
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Not publicly specified
ThicknessTriple-slotVaries by board
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1—
Launch price$1099—
Shader units / cores5120Not publicly specified
Clock speed1925 - 2324 MHzBetter300 - 1250 MHz
Base clock1925 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock2324 MHzBetter1250 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory frequency18 GHz—
Memory bus256 bit—
Memory bandwidth576 GB/s—
InterfacePCIe 4x16IGP
Power consumption335 W—
Process node7 nmBetter14 nm
Recommended PSU700 WVaries by board
Length267 mmVaries by board
Die size520 mm²Not publicly specified
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 4 MBNot publicly specified
Transistor count26800 millionNot publicly specified
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 6950 XTVega 11CU 2400G
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
28 FPSEstimated 66%
21 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
24 FPSEstimated 66%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
18 FPSEstimated 66%
14 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 66%
8 FPSEstimated 66%
Black Myth: WukongRX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2RX 6950 XT234 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G178 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6950 XT165 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G125 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6950 XT128 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G97 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6950 XT64 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G48 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6950 XT151 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G115 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6950 XT130 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G99 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6950 XT93 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G71 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6950 XT43 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G32 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5RX 6950 XT191 FPSEstimated 80%Vega 11CU 2400G145 FPSEstimated 80%RX 6950 XT124 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G94 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6950 XT115 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G88 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6950 XT94 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G71 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökRX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6950 XT124 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G94 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6950 XT103 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G79 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6950 XT83 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G63 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6950 XT43 FPSEstimated 74%Vega 11CU 2400G33 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldRX 6950 XT28 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G18 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT18 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G14 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6950 XT10 FPSEstimated 66%Vega 11CU 2400G8 FPSEstimated 66%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100574328%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100654341%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100664342%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100880200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100570200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100714349%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100694346%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100664342%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100744353%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100664342%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSR—
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1—
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Not publicly specified
Process node7 nmBetter14 nm
Release date20222018
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count26800 millionNot publicly specified
Die size520 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores5120Not publicly specified
Base clock1925 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock2324 MHzBetter1250 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16IGP
Length267 mmVaries by board
ThicknessTriple-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU700 WVaries by board
Power connector8+8 pin—
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors3Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 6950 XT and Vega 11CU 2400G with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM16 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Memory bus256 bit—
TFLOPS23.65Better1.76
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 6950 XT or Vega 11CU 2400G?+
RX 6950 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while Vega 11CU 2400G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 6950 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 6950 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 6950 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 6950 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 6950 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Vega 11CU 2400G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 6950 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6950 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 6950 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 6950 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 6950 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 6950 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.