NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce GT 610
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GT 610
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 2070 SUPER and GT 610 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 2070 SUPER outperforms GT 610 by ~45% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+45%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER (~8%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RTX 2070 SUPER
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5 · DLSS 2
Reasons to consider GT 610
- Lower stated power consumption
- Lower recorded market price
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4531
70100
100100
6843
Graphics card ranking
Positions 98–103of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
163 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GT 610
Price $15.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
45Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
39Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
70
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
56Better
52
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 2070 SUPER and GT 610 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 2070 SUPERGT 610
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
199 FPS
155 FPS
1080p Ultra
140 FPS
109 FPS
1440p Ultra
108 FPS
59 FPS
4K Ultra
40 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RTX 2070 SUPER199 FPSGT 610155 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER140 FPSGT 610109 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER108 FPSGT 61059 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER40 FPSGT 61021 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 2070 SUPER128 FPSGT 610100 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER110 FPSGT 61086 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER79 FPSGT 61042 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER27 FPSGT 61014 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 2070 SUPER162 FPSGT 610127 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER105 FPSGT 61082 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER98 FPSGT 61053 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER59 FPSGT 61031 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 2070 SUPER105 FPSGT 61082 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER88 FPSGT 61069 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER70 FPSGT 61038 FPSRTX 2070 SUPER27 FPSGT 61014 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100453137%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100513246%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100523442%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100684345%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1007010035%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100553642%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100543640%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100523442%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100583842%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100523539%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 2.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureTuringFermi 2.0
Process node12 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20192012
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count13600 millionBetter292 million
Die size545 mm²79 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2560Better48
Base clock1605 MHzBetter810 MHz
Boost clock1770 MHzBetter810 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 2x16
Length267 mm145 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU550 W200 WBetter
Power connector6+8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 1.3a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aBoard dependent
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors53
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better1 GB GDDR3
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS9.062Better0.155
Other comparisons
RTX 2070 SUPERNVIDIAVSRTX 2080NVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 2070 SUPERNVIDIAVSRTX 2080 SUPERNVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 2070 SUPERNVIDIAVS
RX 5500 XT 4GBAMDOpen comparisonRTX 2070 SUPERNVIDIAVSRX 7400AMDOpen comparisonGTX 1660NVIDIAVSRTX 2070 SUPERNVIDIAOpen comparisonRTX 2070 SUPERNVIDIAVS
Arc A380IntelOpen comparisonReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (6)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 2070 SUPER or GT 610?+
RTX 2070 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 2070 SUPER offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 2070 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 2070 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 2070 SUPER offers more overall performance, while RTX 2070 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 2070 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 2070 SUPER is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 2070 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 2070 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 2070 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GT 610 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GT 610 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 2070 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.