H2H

GeForce RTX 2070 vs Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2070 outperforms Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+1%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce RTX 2070 vs Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx: key takeaway

The comparison of RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx shows a 0% advantage for RTX 2070 in gaming performance, while Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Price / performance
Performance
4444
Price / performance
100100
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RTX 2070 is the best overall choice

RTX 2070 leads in combined game performance. RTX 2070 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE7%

RTX 2070 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$1,700

Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 208–213of 319
RTX 2070not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce RTX 2070

178 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Radeon Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx

100/100 · Price $89

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRTX 2070Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44
44
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38
38
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36
36
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
79Better
51
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
58
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRTX 2070Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.1
InterfacePCIe 3x16IGP
Device classDesktopDesktop
Power consumption185 W
Process node12 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU450 WVaries by board
Length229 mmVaries by board
Die size445 mm²Not publicly specified
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 4 MBNot publicly specified
Transistor count10800 millionNot publicly specified
UpscalingDLSS 2FSR
Max monitors54
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CYesNo
TFLOPS7.465Better0.56
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
Power consumption185 W
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Power connector8 pinIntegrated (shared power)
Release date20182022
ArchitectureTuringNot publicly specified
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$499
Shader units / cores2304Not publicly specified
Clock speed1410 - 1620 MHzBetter400 - 2200 MHz
Base clock1410 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock1620 MHz2200 MHzBetter
VRAM8 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory frequency14 GHz
Memory bus256 bitSystem memory interface
Memory bandwidth448 GB/s
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 2070Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 66%
18 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
15 FPSEstimated 66%
14 FPSEstimated 66%
4K Ultra
6 FPSEstimated 60%
8 FPSEstimated 66%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRTX 207023 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207020 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207015 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 20706 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRTX 207023 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207020 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207015 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 20706 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
Counter-Strike 2RTX 2070194 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx182 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 2070137 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx128 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 2070106 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx99 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 207039 FPSEstimated 68%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx49 FPSEstimated 74%
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 2070125 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx117 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 2070108 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx101 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 207077 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx72 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 207026 FPSEstimated 68%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx33 FPSEstimated 74%
Forza Horizon 5RTX 2070158 FPSEstimated 80%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx148 FPSEstimated 80%RTX 2070103 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx96 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 207096 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx89 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 207058 FPSEstimated 68%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx72 FPSEstimated 74%
God of War RagnarökRTX 207023 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207020 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207015 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 20706 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 2070103 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx96 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 207086 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx80 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 207069 FPSEstimated 74%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx64 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 207027 FPSEstimated 68%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx34 FPSEstimated 74%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RTX 207023 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207020 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207015 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 20706 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
Monster Hunter WildsRTX 207023 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207020 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207015 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 20706 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
StarfieldRTX 207023 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx22 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207020 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx18 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 207015 FPSEstimated 66%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx14 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 20706 FPSEstimated 60%Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx8 FPSEstimated 66%
Average FPSRTX 207072 FPSNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx68 FPSRTX 207055 FPSNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx51 FPSRTX 207044 FPSNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx41 FPSRTX 207019 FPSNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx24 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 2070Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10044440%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10049490%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100514415%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100680200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100790200%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 2070Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100554422%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100544420%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100514415%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100574426%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100514415%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 2070Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2FSR
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 3.0

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 2070Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
ArchitectureTuringNot publicly specified
Process node12 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20182022
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 2070Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
Transistor count10800 millionNot publicly specified
Die size445 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores2304Not publicly specified
Base clock1410 MHzBetter400 MHz
Boost clock1620 MHz2200 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 2070Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
InterfacePCIe 3x16IGP
Length229 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU450 WVaries by board
Power connector8 pinIntegrated (shared power)

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 2070Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
HDMIHDMI 2.0HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors54
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 2070 and Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 2070Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx
VRAM8 GB GDDR6- SMA
Memory typeGDDR6SMA
Memory bus256 bitSystem memory interface
TFLOPS7.465Better0.56
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 207062
Device BNavi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx58
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 2070 or Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxx?

RTX 2070 has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 2070 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 2070 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 2070 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 2070 offers more overall performance, while RTX 2070 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 2070 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RTX 2070 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 2070 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 2070 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 2070 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RTX 2070 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RTX 2070 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 2070 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.