H2H

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs Intel Arc A380

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3050 8 GB outperforms Arc A380 by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+22%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs Intel Arc A380: key takeaway

The comparison of RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 shows a 22% advantage for RTX 3050 8 GB in gaming performance, while Arc A380 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4436
Efficiency
100100
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
6860
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RTX 3050 8 GB is the best overall choice

RTX 3050 8 GB leads in combined game performance. RTX 3050 8 GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE8%

RTX 3050 8 GB leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$110

Arc A380 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 51–56of 317
RTX 3050 8 GB#53position in the GPU ranking
Arc A380not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Intel Arc A380

92 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Intel Arc A380

100/100 · Price $139

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRTX 3050 8 GBArc A380
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44Better
36
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
30
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
65Better
60
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRTX 3050 8 GBArc A380
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 2.0
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 2XeSS
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS9.098Better4.198
Power consumption130 W75 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8 pin6 pin
Release date20222022
ArchitectureAmpereXe-HPG
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$299$139Better
Shader units / cores2560Better1024
Length242 mm222 mmBetter
Clock speed1552 - 1777 MHzBetter300 - 2000 MHz
Base clock1552 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock1777 MHz2000 MHzBetter
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency14 GHz15,5 GHzBetter
Memory bus128 bitBetter96 bit
Memory bandwidth224 GB/sBetter186 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Power consumption130 W75 WBetter
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU300 W250 WBetter
Die size276 mm²157 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL2 4 MBBetter
Transistor count12000 millionBetter7200 million
Max monitors44
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 3050 8 GBArc A380
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
26 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
22 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 63%
10 FPSEstimated 59%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRTX 3050 8 GB26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB14 FPSEstimated 63%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RTX 3050 8 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRTX 3050 8 GB26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB14 FPSEstimated 63%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RTX 3050 8 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RTX 3050 8 GB215 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A380188 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 8 GB151 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A380129 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 8 GB101 FPSEstimated 71%Arc A38069 FPSEstimated 67%RTX 3050 8 GB29 FPSEstimated 63%Arc A38023 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 3050 8 GB139 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A380121 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 8 GB120 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A380102 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 8 GB73 FPSEstimated 71%Arc A38050 FPSEstimated 67%RTX 3050 8 GB20 FPSEstimated 63%Arc A38015 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5RTX 3050 8 GB175 FPSEstimated 80%Arc A380153 FPSEstimated 80%RTX 3050 8 GB114 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38097 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 8 GB91 FPSEstimated 71%Arc A38062 FPSEstimated 67%RTX 3050 8 GB43 FPSEstimated 63%Arc A38034 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökRTX 3050 8 GB26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB14 FPSEstimated 63%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RTX 3050 8 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 3050 8 GB114 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38099 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 8 GB95 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38081 FPSEstimated 74%RTX 3050 8 GB65 FPSEstimated 71%Arc A38045 FPSEstimated 67%RTX 3050 8 GB20 FPSEstimated 63%Arc A38016 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RTX 3050 8 GB26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB14 FPSEstimated 63%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RTX 3050 8 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRTX 3050 8 GB26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB14 FPSEstimated 63%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RTX 3050 8 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRTX 3050 8 GB26 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB22 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 8 GB14 FPSEstimated 63%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RTX 3050 8 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSRTX 3050 8 GB80 FPSArc A38069 FPSRTX 3050 8 GB61 FPSArc A38052 FPSRTX 3050 8 GB41 FPSArc A38029 FPSRTX 3050 8 GB14 FPSArc A38012 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 3050 8 GBArc A380Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100443620%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100504413%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100514317%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100686013%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 3050 8 GBArc A380Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100554716%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100544616%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100514317%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100574915%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100514317%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 8 GBArc A380
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 8 GBArc A380
ArchitectureAmpereXe-HPG
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20222022
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 8 GBArc A380
Transistor count12000 millionBetter7200 million
Die size276 mm²157 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2560Better1024
Base clock1552 MHzBetter300 MHz
Boost clock1777 MHz2000 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 8 GBArc A380
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Length242 mm222 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU300 W250 WBetter
Power connector8 pin6 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 8 GBArc A380
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 3050 8 GB and Arc A380 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 3050 8 GBArc A380
VRAM8 GB GDDR6Better6 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bitBetter96 bit
TFLOPS9.098Better4.198
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 3050 8 GB65
Device BArc A38060
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3050 8 GB or Arc A380?

RTX 3050 8 GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3050 8 GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 3050 8 GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 3050 8 GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 3050 8 GB offers more overall performance, while RTX 3050 8 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 3050 8 GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RTX 3050 8 GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 3050 8 GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3050 8 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 3050 8 GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Arc A380 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Arc A380 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 3050 8 GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.