H2H

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs GeForce 8300 GS

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms 8300 GS by 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+75%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs GeForce 8300 GS: key takeaway

The comparison of RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS shows a 75% advantage for RTX 4070 SUPER in gaming performance, while 8300 GS may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
6336
Efficiency
95100
Price / performance
82100
Memory capacity
804
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RTX 4070 SUPER is the best overall choice

RTX 4070 SUPER leads in combined game performance. 8300 GS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE22%

RTX 4070 SUPER leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$565

8300 GS costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 14–19of 317
RTX 4070 SUPER#16position in the GPU ranking
8300 GSnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce 8300 GS

132 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8300 GS

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRTX 4070 SUPER8300 GS
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
63Better
36
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
52Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49Better
30
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
95
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
73Better
60
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRTX 4070 SUPER8300 GS
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 3
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
USB Type-CNoNo
OpenGL4.63.3
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4
TFLOPS35.48Better0.015
Power consumption220 W40 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6XDDR2
Power connector16 pinNone
Release date20242007
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTesla
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Launch price$599$79Better
Shader units / cores7168Better8
Clock speed1980 - 2475 MHzBetter459 MHz
Base clock1980 MHzBetter459 MHz
Boost clock2475 MHzBetter459 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR6X128 MB DDR2Better
Memory frequency21 GHz800 MHzBetter
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth504 GB/s6400 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Power consumption220 W40 WBetter
Process node5 nmBetter80 nm
Recommended PSU550 W200 WBetter
Length267 mmVaries by board
Die size294 mm²127 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 48 MBL2 0.02 MBBetter
Transistor count35800 millionBetter210 million
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 4070 SUPER8300 GS
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
31 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
27 FPSEstimated 66%
17 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 66%
10 FPSEstimated 60%
4K Ultra
11 FPSEstimated 65%
5 FPSEstimated 56%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
Counter-Strike 2RTX 4070 SUPER264 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS171 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER186 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS120 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER144 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS74 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 4070 SUPER68 FPSEstimated 73%8300 GS28 FPSEstimated 64%
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 4070 SUPER171 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS111 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER147 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS95 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER105 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS54 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 4070 SUPER46 FPSEstimated 73%8300 GS19 FPSEstimated 64%
Forza Horizon 5RTX 4070 SUPER215 FPSEstimated 80%8300 GS139 FPSEstimated 78%RTX 4070 SUPER139 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS90 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER130 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS67 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 4070 SUPER100 FPSEstimated 73%8300 GS41 FPSEstimated 64%
God of War RagnarökRTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 4070 SUPER139 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS90 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER117 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS76 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER94 FPSEstimated 74%8300 GS48 FPSEstimated 68%RTX 4070 SUPER46 FPSEstimated 73%8300 GS19 FPSEstimated 64%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
Monster Hunter WildsRTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
StarfieldRTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS20 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS17 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8300 GS10 FPSEstimated 60%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8300 GS5 FPSEstimated 56%
Average FPSRTX 4070 SUPER98 FPS8300 GS63 FPSRTX 4070 SUPER75 FPS8300 GS48 FPSRTX 4070 SUPER59 FPS8300 GS30 FPSRTX 4070 SUPER33 FPS8300 GS14 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 4070 SUPER8300 GSDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100633655%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100682883%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100682786%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100804181%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100951005%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 4070 SUPER8300 GSDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 1007121109%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 1007023101%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100682786%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1007218120%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100682689%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8300 GS
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingDLSS 3
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8300 GS
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTesla
Process node5 nmBetter80 nm
Release date20242007
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8300 GS
Transistor count35800 millionBetter210 million
Die size294 mm²127 mm²Better
Shader units / cores7168Better8
Base clock1980 MHzBetter459 MHz
Boost clock2475 MHzBetter459 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8300 GS
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Length267 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU550 W200 WBetter
Power connector16 pinNone

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8300 GS
HDMIHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8300 GS with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8300 GS
VRAM12 GB GDDR6X128 MB DDR2Better
Memory typeGDDR6XDDR2
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS35.48Better0.015
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 4070 SUPER73
Device B8300 GS60
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4070 SUPER or 8300 GS?

RTX 4070 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while 8300 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 4070 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 4070 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 4070 SUPER offers more overall performance, while RTX 4070 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 4070 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

8300 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 4070 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4070 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 4070 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8300 GS is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8300 GS is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 4070 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.