H2H

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms 8800 GTS rev 2 by 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+62%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2: key takeaway

The comparison of RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 shows a 62% advantage for RTX 4070 SUPER in gaming performance, while 8800 GTS rev 2 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
6339
Efficiency
9596
Price / performance
82100
Memory capacity
8013
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RTX 4070 SUPER is the best overall choice

RTX 4070 SUPER leads in combined game performance. 8800 GTS rev 2 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE20%

RTX 4070 SUPER leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$565

8800 GTS rev 2 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 14–19of 317
RTX 4070 SUPER#16position in the GPU ranking
8800 GTS rev 2#85position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

101 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8800 GTS rev 2

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRTX 4070 SUPER8800 GTS rev 2
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
63Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
52Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
95
96Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
73Better
61
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRTX 4070 SUPER8800 GTS rev 2
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 3
Max monitors4Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 4320Varies by board
USB Type-CNoNo
OpenGL4.63.3
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4
TFLOPS35.48Better0.022
Power consumption220 W135 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR3
Power connector16 pin6 pin
Release date20242007
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTesla
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Launch price$599$79Better
Shader units / cores7168Better8
Clock speed1980 - 2475 MHzBetter650 MHz
Base clock1980 MHzBetter650 MHz
Boost clock2475 MHzBetter650 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR6X512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory frequency21 GHzBetter1,64 GHz
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth504 GB/sBetter52 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Power consumption220 W135 WBetter
Process node5 nmBetter65 nm
Recommended PSU550 W200 WBetter
Length267 mm170 mmBetter
Die size294 mm²86 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 48 MBL2 0.02 MBBetter
Transistor count35800 millionBetter210 million
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 4070 SUPER8800 GTS rev 2
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
31 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
27 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 66%
11 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
11 FPSEstimated 65%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RTX 4070 SUPER264 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2194 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER186 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2137 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER144 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 276 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 4070 SUPER68 FPSEstimated 73%8800 GTS rev 229 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 4070 SUPER171 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2125 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER147 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2108 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER105 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 255 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 4070 SUPER46 FPSEstimated 73%8800 GTS rev 219 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 5RTX 4070 SUPER215 FPSEstimated 80%8800 GTS rev 2158 FPSEstimated 78%RTX 4070 SUPER139 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2102 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER130 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 269 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 4070 SUPER100 FPSEstimated 73%8800 GTS rev 242 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War RagnarökRTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 4070 SUPER139 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 2102 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER117 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 286 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 4070 SUPER94 FPSEstimated 74%8800 GTS rev 250 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 4070 SUPER46 FPSEstimated 73%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRTX 4070 SUPER31 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 223 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER27 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 220 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 4070 SUPER20 FPSEstimated 66%8800 GTS rev 211 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 4070 SUPER11 FPSEstimated 65%8800 GTS rev 25 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSRTX 4070 SUPER98 FPS8800 GTS rev 272 FPSRTX 4070 SUPER75 FPS8800 GTS rev 255 FPSRTX 4070 SUPER59 FPS8800 GTS rev 232 FPSRTX 4070 SUPER33 FPS8800 GTS rev 214 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 4070 SUPER8800 GTS rev 2Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100633947%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100683272%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100683272%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008013144%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 10095961%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRTX 4070 SUPER8800 GTS rev 2Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100712790%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100702886%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100683272%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1007224100%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100683175%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8800 GTS rev 2
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingDLSS 3
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8800 GTS rev 2
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTesla
Process node5 nmBetter65 nm
Release date20242007
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8800 GTS rev 2
Transistor count35800 millionBetter210 million
Die size294 mm²86 mm²Better
Shader units / cores7168Better8
Base clock1980 MHzBetter650 MHz
Boost clock2475 MHzBetter650 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8800 GTS rev 2
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Length267 mm170 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU550 W200 WBetter
Power connector16 pin6 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8800 GTS rev 2
HDMIHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors4Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 4320Varies by board

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 4070 SUPER and 8800 GTS rev 2 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRTX 4070 SUPER8800 GTS rev 2
VRAM12 GB GDDR6X512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR3
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS35.48Better0.022
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 4070 SUPER73
Device B8800 GTS rev 261
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4070 SUPER or 8800 GTS rev 2?

RTX 4070 SUPER has the higher overall gaming score, while 8800 GTS rev 2 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 4070 SUPER is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 4070 SUPER is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 4070 SUPER offers more overall performance, while RTX 4070 SUPER offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 4070 SUPER is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 4070 SUPER leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4070 SUPER can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 4070 SUPER is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8800 GTS rev 2 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8800 GTS rev 2 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 4070 SUPER if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.