GeForce RTX 4080 vs GeForce 9800 GT

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX 4080 and 9800 GT across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4080 outperforms 9800 GT by ~85% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+85%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?

H2HBench Data Quality

Low confidence
Specifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026

Limited verified data

H2HBench Verdict

Higher catalog score: GeForce RTX 4080 (~14%)

The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.

Reasons to consider RTX 4080

  • Higher catalog performance index
  • More graphics memory
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9 · DLSS 3

Reasons to consider 9800 GT

  • Lower stated power consumption
  • Higher catalog value index
  • Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Low confidence

Catalog metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
7239
Efficiency
75100
Price / performance
49100
Memory capacity
8813
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 16–21of 321
RTX 4080#18position in the GPU ranking
9800 GT#83position in the GPU ranking

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

GeForce RTX 4080

129 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

BEST PRICE / PERFORMANCE

GeForce 9800 GT

Price $35.00

Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRTX 40809800 GT
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
72Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
58Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
56Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
75
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
65Better
57

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRTX 40809800 GT
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Interface
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory bus
Memory bandwidthBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cacheBetter
Transistor countBetter

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 4080 and 9800 GT across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RTX 40809800 GT
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p High
297 FPS
195 FPS
1080p Ultra
209 FPS
137 FPS
1440p Ultra
162 FPS
77 FPS
4K Ultra
81 FPS
29 FPS
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Counter-Strike 2RTX 4080297 FPS9800 GT195 FPSRTX 4080209 FPS9800 GT137 FPSRTX 4080162 FPS9800 GT77 FPSRTX 408081 FPS9800 GT29 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 4080192 FPS9800 GT126 FPSRTX 4080165 FPS9800 GT108 FPSRTX 4080118 FPS9800 GT56 FPSRTX 408054 FPS9800 GT19 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RTX 4080242 FPS9800 GT159 FPSRTX 4080156 FPS9800 GT103 FPSRTX 4080146 FPS9800 GT69 FPSRTX 4080119 FPS9800 GT43 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 4080156 FPS9800 GT103 FPSRTX 4080131 FPS9800 GT86 FPSRTX 4080105 FPS9800 GT50 FPSRTX 408055 FPS9800 GT20 FPS
Average FPSRTX 4080222 FPS9800 GT146 FPSRTX 4080165 FPS9800 GT109 FPSRTX 4080133 FPS9800 GT63 FPSRTX 408077 FPS9800 GT28 FPS

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRTX 40809800 GTDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100723959%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100763281%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100763281%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008813149%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1007510029%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRTX 40809800 GTDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100792798%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100782894%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100763281%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1008124109%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100773185%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

SpecificationsRTX 40809800 GT
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingDLSS 3Not supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1

Architecture and release

SpecificationsRTX 40809800 GT
ArchitectureAda LovelaceTesla
Process node5 nmBetter65 nm
Release date20222008
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

SpecificationsRTX 40809800 GT
Transistor count45900 millionBetter754 million
Die size379 mm²324 mm²Better
Shader units / cores9728Better112
Base clock2205 MHzBetter600 MHz
Boost clock2505 MHzBetter600 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

SpecificationsRTX 40809800 GT
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Length310 mm229 mmBetter
ThicknessTriple-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU700 W300 WBetter
Power connector16 pin6 pin

Display outputs and limits

SpecificationsRTX 40809800 GT
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600

Memory and compute throughput

SpecificationsRTX 40809800 GT
VRAM16 GB GDDR6X512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR3
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS48.74Better0.336

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARTX 408065
Device B9800 GT57
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

Evidence details

Data coverage

Verified gaming results
0
Verified synthetic results
0
Games with verified results
0
Verified community results
0
Estimated / unverified results
32
Specifications
0 / 70

Specification record updated:

Benchmarks updated:

Price record updated:

Comparison reviewed:

Calculated scores · How is this calculated?

Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.

clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)
Price evidence · View sources (5)

Verified community results

No verified community benchmarks yet.

Reviewed by

No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.

Comparison history

Show recorded changes (5)
  1. · Record updated: products
  2. · Record updated: products
  3. · Record changed: product_prices
  4. · Record updated: products
  5. · Record updated: products

Why you can trust this comparison

Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.

Report incorrect data

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RTX 4080 or 9800 GT?

RTX 4080 has the higher overall gaming score, while 9800 GT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 4080 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 4080 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RTX 4080 offers more overall performance, while RTX 4080 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 4080 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

9800 GT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RTX 4080 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4080 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RTX 4080 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

9800 GT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

9800 GT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RTX 4080 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.