AMD
Radeon RX 5600 vs GeForce GTS 250
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTS 250
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 5600 and GTS 250 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 5600 outperforms GTS 250 by ~1% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+1%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 5600 (~4%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 5600
- More graphics memory
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Reasons to consider GTS 250
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3939
10087
100100
6013
Graphics card ranking
Positions 107–112of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTS 250
155 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
87
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
55
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
Length
OpenGL
DirectX
Vulkan
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 5600 and GTS 250 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 5600GTS 250
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
191 FPS
196 FPS
1080p Ultra
134 FPS
137 FPS
1440p Ultra
88 FPS
77 FPS
4K Ultra
27 FPS
29 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 5600191 FPSGTS 250196 FPSRX 5600134 FPSGTS 250137 FPSRX 560088 FPSGTS 25077 FPSRX 560027 FPSGTS 25029 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 5600123 FPSGTS 250126 FPSRX 5600106 FPSGTS 250109 FPSRX 560064 FPSGTS 25056 FPSRX 560018 FPSGTS 25019 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 5600156 FPSGTS 250159 FPSRX 5600101 FPSGTS 250103 FPSRX 560079 FPSGTS 25069 FPSRX 560040 FPSGTS 25043 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 5600101 FPSGTS 250103 FPSRX 560084 FPSGTS 25086 FPSRX 560057 FPSGTS 25050 FPSRX 560018 FPSGTS 25020 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10039390%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100443329%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100453234%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1006013129%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001008714%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100492758%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100482853%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100453234%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100512472%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100453137%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.110.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.1
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0Tesla
Process node7 nmBetter55 nm
Release date20202009
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count10300 millionBetter754 million
Die size251 mm²Better260 mm²
Shader units / cores2304Better128
Base clock1130 MHzBetter738 MHz
Boost clock1560 MHzBetter738 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by board229 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board450 W
Power connector8 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aBoard dependent
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors42
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM6 GB GDDR6512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS6.39Better0.415
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (5)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 5600 or GTS 250?+
RX 5600 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 5600 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTS 250 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTS 250 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 5600 offers more overall performance, while RX 5600 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTS 250 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 5600 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 5600 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 5600 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 5600 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 5600 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 5600 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 5600 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.