H2H

Radeon RX 590 GME vs Intel Arc A310

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 590 GME and Arc A310 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 590 GME outperforms Arc A310 by 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+24%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 590 GME vs Intel Arc A310: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 590 GME and Arc A310 shows a 24% advantage for RX 590 GME in gaming performance, while Arc A310 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4133
Efficiency
78100
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
6860
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RX 590 GME is the best overall choice

RX 590 GME leads in combined game performance. RX 590 GME offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE2%

RX 590 GME leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$5

Arc A310 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 152–157of 317
RX 590 GMEnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
Arc A310not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 590 GME

71 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Intel Arc A310

100/100 · Price $169

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 590 GME and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 590 GMEArc A310
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
41Better
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
36Better
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
78
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59Better
58
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 590 GME and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 590 GMEArc A310
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4amini-DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSRXeSS
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.012.2
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS6.543Better2.688
Power consumption175 W75 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Power connector8 pinNone
Release date20202022
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Xe-HPG
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$229$169Better
Shader units / cores2304Better768
Clock speed1257 - 1380 MHz1750 - 2000 MHzBetter
Base clock1257 MHz1750 MHzBetter
Boost clock1380 MHz2000 MHzBetter
VRAM8 GB GDDR5Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency8 GHz15,5 GHzBetter
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth256 GB/sBetter124 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4x8
Power consumption175 W75 WBetter
Process node14 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU450 W200 WBetter
Length241 mmVaries by board
Die size232 mm²157 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 16 KB, L2 2 MBL2 4 MBBetter
Transistor count5700 million7200 millionBetter
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 590 GME and Arc A310 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 590 GMEArc A310
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
23 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
17 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
13 FPSEstimated 64%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 57%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 590 GME189 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A310165 FPSEstimated 72%RX 590 GME133 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A310116 FPSEstimated 72%RX 590 GME96 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A31062 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME31 FPSEstimated 65%Arc A31022 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 590 GME122 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A310106 FPSEstimated 72%RX 590 GME105 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A31092 FPSEstimated 72%RX 590 GME70 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A31045 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME21 FPSEstimated 65%Arc A31015 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5RX 590 GME154 FPSEstimated 80%Arc A310134 FPSEstimated 78%RX 590 GME100 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A31087 FPSEstimated 72%RX 590 GME86 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A31056 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME46 FPSEstimated 65%Arc A31033 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökRX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 590 GME100 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A31087 FPSEstimated 72%RX 590 GME84 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A31073 FPSEstimated 72%RX 590 GME62 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A31041 FPSEstimated 66%RX 590 GME21 FPSEstimated 65%Arc A31015 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 590 GME23 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME19 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RX 590 GME13 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RX 590 GME5 FPSEstimated 57%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSRX 590 GME70 FPSArc A31061 FPSRX 590 GME54 FPSArc A31047 FPSRX 590 GME39 FPSArc A31026 FPSRX 590 GME15 FPSArc A31012 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 590 GME and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 590 GMEArc A310Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100413322%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10046429%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100494118%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100686013%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1007810025%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 590 GME and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 590 GMEArc A310Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100534516%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100524417%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100494118%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100564815%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100494118%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 590 GME and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 590 GMEArc A310
DirectX12.012.2
Vulkan1.31.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRXeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 590 GME and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 590 GMEArc A310
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Xe-HPG
Process node14 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20202022
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 590 GME and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 590 GMEArc A310
Transistor count5700 million7200 millionBetter
Die size232 mm²157 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2304Better768
Base clock1257 MHz1750 MHzBetter
Boost clock1380 MHz2000 MHzBetter

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 590 GME and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 590 GMEArc A310
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4x8
Length241 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU450 W200 WBetter
Power connector8 pinNone

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 590 GME and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 590 GMEArc A310
HDMIHDMI 2.0bHDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4amini-DisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 590 GME and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 590 GMEArc A310
VRAM8 GB GDDR5Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS6.543Better2.688
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 590 GME59
Device BArc A31058
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 590 GME or Arc A310?

RX 590 GME has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 590 GME offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RX 590 GME is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RX 590 GME is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 590 GME offers more overall performance, while RX 590 GME offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RX 590 GME is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 590 GME is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 590 GME leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 590 GME can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 590 GME is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Arc A310 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Arc A310 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 590 GME if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.