H2H

Radeon RX 6600 vs Radeon RX 7400

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 6600 and RX 7400 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6600 outperforms RX 7400 by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+5%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 6600 vs Radeon RX 7400: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 6600 and RX 7400 shows a 5% advantage for RX 6600 in gaming performance, while RX 7400 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4240
Efficiency
100100
Price / performance
10088
Memory capacity
6868
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RX 6600 is the best overall choice

RX 6600 leads in combined game performance. RX 6600 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE7%

RX 6600 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$155

RX 6600 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 66–71of 317
RX 6600#68position in the GPU ranking
RX 7400not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 6600

180 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Radeon RX 6600

100/100 · Price $329

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 6600 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 6600RX 7400
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
42Better
40
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37Better
35
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34Better
33
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
60
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 6600 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 6600RX 7400
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSRFSR
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS8.928Better8
Power consumption132 W55 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8 pin1x 6-pin
Release date20212025
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0RDNA 3.0Better
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.2
Launch price$329$299Better
Shader units / cores17921792
Clock speed1626 - 2491 MHzBetter1452 - 2300 MHz
Base clock1626 MHzBetter1452 MHz
Boost clock2491 MHzBetter2300 MHz
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency16 GHzBetter10,8 GHz
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
Memory bandwidth256 GB/sBetter173 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Power consumption132 W55 WBetter
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU300 W200 WBetter
Length190 mmVaries by board
Die size237 mm²204 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
Transistor count11060 million13300 millionBetter
Max monitors44
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1a
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6600 and RX 7400 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 6600RX 7400
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 64%
12 FPSEstimated 61%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 660024 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660014 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 66005 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 660024 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660014 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 66005 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 6600201 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400197 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6600141 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400139 FPSEstimated 74%RX 660098 FPSEstimated 72%RX 740085 FPSEstimated 69%RX 660029 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740027 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6600130 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400127 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6600112 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400110 FPSEstimated 74%RX 660071 FPSEstimated 72%RX 740062 FPSEstimated 69%RX 660019 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740018 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 5RX 6600164 FPSEstimated 80%RX 7400161 FPSEstimated 80%RX 6600106 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400104 FPSEstimated 74%RX 660088 FPSEstimated 72%RX 740077 FPSEstimated 69%RX 660042 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740040 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War RagnarökRX 660024 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660014 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 66005 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6600106 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400104 FPSEstimated 74%RX 660089 FPSEstimated 74%RX 740087 FPSEstimated 74%RX 660064 FPSEstimated 72%RX 740055 FPSEstimated 69%RX 660020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740018 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 660024 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660014 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 66005 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 660024 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660014 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 66005 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 660024 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 660014 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 66005 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSRX 660075 FPSRX 740073 FPSRX 660057 FPSRX 740056 FPSRX 660041 FPSRX 740035 FPSRX 660014 FPSRX 740013 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 6600 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6600RX 7400Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10042405%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10052504%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10049482%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10068680%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 6600 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 6600RX 7400Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10054532%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10053514%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10049482%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10056560%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10050484%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 6600 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6600RX 7400
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.2

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 6600 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6600RX 7400
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0RDNA 3.0Better
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20212025
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 6600 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6600RX 7400
Transistor count11060 million13300 millionBetter
Die size237 mm²204 mm²Better
Shader units / cores17921792
Base clock1626 MHzBetter1452 MHz
Boost clock2491 MHzBetter2300 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 6600 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6600RX 7400
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Length190 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU300 W200 WBetter
Power connector8 pin1x 6-pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 6600 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6600RX 7400
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 2.1
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 6600 and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 6600RX 7400
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS8.928Better8
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 660064
Device BRX 740060
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 6600 or RX 7400?

RX 6600 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6600 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RX 6600 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RX 6600 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 6600 offers more overall performance, while RX 6600 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RX 6600 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 6600 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 6600 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6600 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 6600 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RX 7400 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RX 7400 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 6600 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.