AMD
Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Radeon RX 7400
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 7400
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6600 XT outperforms RX 7400 by 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+8%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon RX 6600 XT vs Radeon RX 7400: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 shows a 8% advantage for RX 6600 XT in gaming performance, while RX 7400 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4340
90100
10088
6868
COMPARISON RESULT
RX 6600 XT is the best overall choice
RX 6600 XT leads in combined game performance. RX 6600 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 6600 XT leads in the combined performance index
RX 6600 XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 77–82of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6600 XT
107 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 7400
88/100 · Price $299The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
43Better
40
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
37Better
35
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
35Better
33
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
90
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
60
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 2.1
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1a
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSRFSR
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS10.6Better8
Power consumption160 W55 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8 pin1x 6-pin
Release date20212025
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0RDNA 3.0Better
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.2
Launch price$379$299Better
Shader units / cores2048Better1792
Clock speed1968 - 2589 MHzBetter1452 - 2300 MHz
Base clock1968 MHzBetter1452 MHz
Boost clock2589 MHzBetter2300 MHz
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency16 GHzBetter10,8 GHz
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
Memory bandwidth256 GB/sBetter173 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Power consumption160 W55 WBetter
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU450 W200 WBetter
Length190 mmVaries by board
Die size237 mm²204 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
Transistor count11060 million13300 millionBetter
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 6600 XTRX 7400
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
21 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 64%
12 FPSEstimated 61%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 56%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongRX 6600 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT14 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 6600 XT5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 6600 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT14 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 6600 XT5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 6600 XT205 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400197 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6600 XT144 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400139 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6600 XT100 FPSEstimated 72%RX 740085 FPSEstimated 69%RX 6600 XT29 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740027 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6600 XT133 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400127 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6600 XT114 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400110 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6600 XT73 FPSEstimated 72%RX 740062 FPSEstimated 69%RX 6600 XT20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740018 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 5RX 6600 XT167 FPSEstimated 80%RX 7400161 FPSEstimated 80%RX 6600 XT108 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400104 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6600 XT90 FPSEstimated 72%RX 740077 FPSEstimated 69%RX 6600 XT43 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740040 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War RagnarökRX 6600 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT14 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 6600 XT5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6600 XT108 FPSEstimated 74%RX 7400104 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6600 XT91 FPSEstimated 74%RX 740087 FPSEstimated 74%RX 6600 XT65 FPSEstimated 72%RX 740055 FPSEstimated 69%RX 6600 XT20 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740018 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 6600 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT14 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 6600 XT5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 6600 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT14 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 6600 XT5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 6600 XT24 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740023 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT21 FPSEstimated 66%RX 740020 FPSEstimated 66%RX 6600 XT14 FPSEstimated 64%RX 740012 FPSEstimated 61%RX 6600 XT5 FPSEstimated 56%RX 74005 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10043407%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10053506%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10050484%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10068680%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1009010011%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10054532%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10053514%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10050484%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10057562%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10051486%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 2.2
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0RDNA 3.0Better
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20212025
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count11060 million13300 millionBetter
Die size237 mm²204 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2048Better1792
Base clock1968 MHzBetter1452 MHz
Boost clock2589 MHzBetter2300 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Length190 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU450 W200 WBetter
Power connector8 pin1x 6-pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 2.1
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 6600 XT and RX 7400 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS10.6Better8
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 6600 XT or RX 7400?+
RX 6600 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6600 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 6600 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 6600 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 6600 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 6600 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 6600 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 6600 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 6600 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6600 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 6600 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 7400 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 7400 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 6600 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.