AMD
Radeon RX 6750 XT vs GeForce GTX 680
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GTX 680
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 6750 XT and GTX 680 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6750 XT outperforms GTX 680 by ~43% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+43%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 6750 XT (~30%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 6750 XT
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Reasons to consider GTX 680
- Lower stated power consumption
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5035
6760
6769
8056
Graphics card ranking
Positions 74–79of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
130 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 680
Price $37.00Based on catalog performance per unit of current market price, not measured FPS.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50Better
35
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40Better
29
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
67Better
60
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
52Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI
DisplayPort
Device class
Upscaling
Max resolution
USB Type-C
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch priceBetter
Shader units / coresBetter
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Recommended PSUBetter
LengthBetter
Die sizeBetter
Memory cache
Transistor countBetter
Max monitors
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6750 XT and GTX 680 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 6750 XTGTX 680
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
211 FPS
178 FPS
1080p Ultra
149 FPS
122 FPS
1440p Ultra
116 FPS
67 FPS
4K Ultra
51 FPS
24 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 6750 XT211 FPSGTX 680178 FPSRX 6750 XT149 FPSGTX 680122 FPSRX 6750 XT116 FPSGTX 68067 FPSRX 6750 XT51 FPSGTX 68024 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6750 XT136 FPSGTX 680115 FPSRX 6750 XT118 FPSGTX 68096 FPSRX 6750 XT84 FPSGTX 68048 FPSRX 6750 XT34 FPSGTX 68016 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 6750 XT172 FPSGTX 680145 FPSRX 6750 XT111 FPSGTX 68091 FPSRX 6750 XT104 FPSGTX 68060 FPSRX 6750 XT76 FPSGTX 68035 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6750 XT111 FPSGTX 68094 FPSRX 6750 XT93 FPSGTX 68076 FPSRX 6750 XT75 FPSGTX 68043 FPSRX 6750 XT35 FPSGTX 68016 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100503535%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100603845%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100584134%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100805635%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100676011%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100634436%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100624336%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100584134%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100664636%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100594136%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.41.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.0
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Kepler
Process node7 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20222012
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count17200 millionBetter3540 million
Die size335 mm²294 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2560Better1536
Base clock2150 MHzBetter1006 MHz
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter1058 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3x16
Length267 mm256 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU600 W450 WBetter
Power connector6+8 pin6+6 pin
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 1.4a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort 1.2
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM12 GB GDDR6Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS13.31Better3.25
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 70
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (4)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (6)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 6750 XT or GTX 680?+
RX 6750 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 680 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 680 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 680 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 6750 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 6750 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 680 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 680 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 6750 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6750 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 6750 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 680 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 680 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 6750 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.