AMD
Radeon RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled vs GeForce 920M
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 920M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled and GeForce 920M across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled outperforms GeForce 920M by ~87% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+87%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled (~21%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
- Higher catalog performance index
- More graphics memory
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0 · FSR
Reasons to consider GeForce 920M
- Lower stated power consumption
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5 · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5630
53100
5454
8843
Graphics card ranking
Positions 188–193of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled
154 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
56Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
47Better
28
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
53
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
51Better
42
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
Memory cache
TFLOPSBetter
Power consumptionBetter
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Launch price——
Clock speedBetter
Base clockBetter
Boost clockBetter
VRAMBetter
Memory frequencyBetter
Memory busBetter
Memory bandwidthBetter
Interface
Power consumptionBetter
Process nodeBetter
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
Architecture
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled and GeForce 920M across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 6900 XT / Liquid CooledGeForce 920M
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
232 FPS
153 FPS
1080p Ultra
163 FPS
108 FPS
1440p Ultra
127 FPS
58 FPS
4K Ultra
63 FPS
21 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled232 FPSGeForce 920M153 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled163 FPSGeForce 920M108 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled127 FPSGeForce 920M58 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled63 FPSGeForce 920M21 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled150 FPSGeForce 920M99 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled129 FPSGeForce 920M85 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled92 FPSGeForce 920M42 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled42 FPSGeForce 920M14 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled189 FPSGeForce 920M125 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled122 FPSGeForce 920M81 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled114 FPSGeForce 920M52 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled93 FPSGeForce 920M31 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled122 FPSGeForce 920M81 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled102 FPSGeForce 920M68 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled82 FPSGeForce 920M37 FPSRX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled43 FPSGeForce 920M14 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100563060%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100653268%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100653463%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100884369%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1005310061%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100703664%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100693565%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100653463%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100743767%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100663464%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.211.0
Vulkan1.21.2
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 3.5
Architecture and release
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedMaxwell
Process node7 nmBetter28 nm
Release date20212015
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor countNot publicly specified1020 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified87 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified384
Base clock2050 MHzBetter954 MHz
Boost clock2435 MHzBetter954 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 3.0 x8
LengthVaries by boardOEM dependent
ThicknessVaries by boardIGP
Recommended PSUVaries by boardOEM dependent
Power connector8+8 pinNone
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors4OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320Depends on host system
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6Better2 GB DDR3
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5 / DDR3
Memory bus256 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS23.04Better0.733
Other comparisons
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDVSRX 6900 XT / Liquid CooledAMDOpen comparisonRX 590AMDVSRX 6900 XT / Liquid CooledAMDOpen comparisonRX 6500 XTAMDVSRX 6900 XT / Liquid CooledAMDOpen comparisonRX 6650 XTAMDVSRX 6900 XT / Liquid CooledAMDOpen comparisonRX 6800 XTAMDVSRX 6900 XT / Liquid CooledAMDOpen comparisonRX 6900 XT / Liquid CooledAMDVSVega 11CU 3400GAMDOpen comparisonReviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 68
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (3)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled or GeForce 920M?+
RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 920M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 920M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled offers more overall performance, while RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 920M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GeForce 920M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GeForce 920M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 6900 XT / Liquid Cooled if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.