AMD
Radeon RX 6950 XT vs GeForce 9100M G
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
NVIDIA
GeForce 9100M G
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 6950 XT and GeForce 9100M G across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 6950 XT outperforms GeForce 9100M G by ~50% on the catalog index; this is not a measured FPS gain.+50%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better. How is this calculated?H2HBench Data Quality
Low confidenceSpecifications: Field verification not recordedVerified gaming results: 0Estimated / unverified results: 32Price record updated: Sep 6, 2026
Limited verified data
H2HBench Verdict
Higher catalog score: Radeon RX 6950 XT (~25%)
The score difference is not a measured FPS improvement.
Reasons to consider RX 6950 XT
- Higher catalog performance index
- Recorded feature support: OpenCL 2.1 · FSR
Reasons to consider GeForce 9100M G
- Higher catalog value index
- Recorded feature support: CUDA / OpenCL 1.x · Not supported
Catalog metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMD
NVIDIAPerformance
Price / performance
5738
4565
Graphics card ranking
Positions 67–72of 321
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 9100M G
144 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
57Better
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
47Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
45Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
57Better
33
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
50Better
40
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
DisplayPort
HDMI
Device class
Upscaling
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
TFLOPS
Power consumption—
Memory type
Power connector
Release date
Architecture
Thickness
Compute API
Launch price—
Shader units / cores
Clock speed—
Base clock
Boost clock
VRAM
Memory frequency—
Memory bus
Memory bandwidth—
Interface
Power consumption—
Process node—
Recommended PSU
Length
Die size
Memory cache
Transistor count
Max monitors
Max resolution
USB Type-C
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 6950 XT and GeForce 9100M G across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 6950 XTGeForce 9100M G
Verified externalEstimatedSources ↗
Counter-Strike 2
1080p High
234 FPS
157 FPS
1080p Ultra
165 FPS
111 FPS
1440p Ultra
128 FPS
86 FPS
4K Ultra
64 FPS
43 FPS
Counter-Strike 2RX 6950 XT234 FPSGeForce 9100M G157 FPSRX 6950 XT165 FPSGeForce 9100M G111 FPSRX 6950 XT128 FPSGeForce 9100M G86 FPSRX 6950 XT64 FPSGeForce 9100M G43 FPS
Cyberpunk 2077RX 6950 XT151 FPSGeForce 9100M G102 FPSRX 6950 XT130 FPSGeForce 9100M G88 FPSRX 6950 XT93 FPSGeForce 9100M G62 FPSRX 6950 XT43 FPSGeForce 9100M G29 FPS
Forza Horizon 5RX 6950 XT191 FPSGeForce 9100M G128 FPSRX 6950 XT124 FPSGeForce 9100M G83 FPSRX 6950 XT115 FPSGeForce 9100M G77 FPSRX 6950 XT94 FPSGeForce 9100M G63 FPS
Hogwarts LegacyRX 6950 XT124 FPSGeForce 9100M G83 FPSRX 6950 XT103 FPSGeForce 9100M G69 FPSRX 6950 XT83 FPSGeForce 9100M G56 FPSRX 6950 XT43 FPSGeForce 9100M G29 FPS
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100573840%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100653852%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100663854%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100880200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100570200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100713861%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100693858%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100663854%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100743864%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100663854%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1CUDA / OpenCL 1.x
Architecture and release
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0Tesla
Process node7 nm—
Release date20222008
Device classDesktopMobile
GPU cores, die and clocks
Transistor count26800 millionNot publicly specified
Die size520 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores5120Not publicly specified
Base clock1925 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Boost clock2324 MHzOEM/TGP dependent
Board size, power and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16OEM platform dependent
Length267 mmOEM dependent
ThicknessTriple-slotOEM dependent
Recommended PSU700 WOEM dependent
Power connector8+8 pinIntegrated laptop power
Display outputs and limits
HDMIHDMI 2.1OEM dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aOEM dependent
USB Type-CNoOEM dependent
Max monitors3OEM dependent
Max resolution7680 × 4320OEM dependent
Memory and compute throughput
VRAM16 GB GDDR6OEM configuration dependent
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3 / DDR2
Memory bus256 bitOEM configuration dependent
TFLOPS23.65Not published (legacy architecture)
Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
Evidence details
Data coverage
- Verified gaming results
- 0
- Verified synthetic results
- 0
- Games with verified results
- 0
- Verified community results
- 0
- Estimated / unverified results
- 32
- Specifications
- 0 / 63
Calculated scores · How is this calculated?
Scores use the catalog model and may include estimated inputs. Open each score to see its origin and the methodology.
clamp(round(performance × 0.7 + (efficiency ?? 50) × 0.2 + (value is missing ? 0 : (value − 50) × 0.2)), 0, 100)Price evidence · View sources (3)
Verified community results
No verified community benchmarks yet.
Reviewed by
No individual editorial review is recorded for this comparison.
Comparison history
Show recorded changes (4)
- · Record updated: products
- · Record changed: product_prices
- · Record updated: products
- · Record updated: products
Why you can trust this comparison
Origin and confidence are evaluated from the evidence attached to each value. Unverified results are identified, and specification, benchmark and price dates remain separate.
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
Moderator reviewedHelpful to the communityExpert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 6950 XT or GeForce 9100M G?+
RX 6950 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while GeForce 9100M G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GeForce 9100M G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GeForce 9100M G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 6950 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 6950 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GeForce 9100M G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GeForce 9100M G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 6950 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6950 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 6950 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 6950 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 6950 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 6950 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.