H2H

Radeon RX 7700 XT vs ATI Radeon HD 2350

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 7700 XT outperforms ATI Radeon HD 2350 by 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+63%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon RX 7700 XT vs ATI Radeon HD 2350: key takeaway

The comparison of RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 shows a 63% advantage for RX 7700 XT in gaming performance, while ATI Radeon HD 2350 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
6238
Efficiency
84100
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
807
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

RX 7700 XT is the best overall choice

RX 7700 XT leads in combined game performance. RX 7700 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE19%

RX 7700 XT leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$350

ATI Radeon HD 2350 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 17–22of 317
RX 7700 XT#19position in the GPU ranking
ATI Radeon HD 2350#92position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

ATI Radeon HD 2350

146 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

ATI Radeon HD 2350

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryRX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 2350
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
62Better
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
51Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
84
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
74Better
62
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationRX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 2350
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1
HDMIHDMI 2.1a
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSR
USB Type-CYesNo
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL4.64.4
TFLOPS35.17Better0.048
Power consumption245 W20 WBetter
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Power connector8+8 pin
Release date20232007
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Not publicly specified
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2
Launch price$449
Shader units / cores3456Not publicly specified
Clock speed1700 - 2544 MHzBetter525 MHz
Base clock1700 MHzBetter525 MHz
Boost clock2544 MHzBetter525 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR6256 MB DDR2Better
Memory frequency18 GHz800 MHzBetter
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth432 GB/s6400 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 1x16
Power consumption245 W20 WBetter
Process node5 nmBetter65 nm
Recommended PSU550 WVaries by board
Length267 mmVaries by board
Die size346 mm²Not publicly specified
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBNot publicly specified
Transistor count28100 millionNot publicly specified
Max monitors4Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 4320Varies by board
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

RX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 2350
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
31 FPSEstimated 66%
22 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
27 FPSEstimated 66%
18 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 66%
11 FPSEstimated 60%
4K Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 64%
5 FPSEstimated 56%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongRX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%
Counter-Strike 2RX 7700 XT264 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 2350182 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT186 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 2350128 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT144 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235079 FPSEstimated 68%RX 7700 XT64 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 235030 FPSEstimated 64%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7700 XT171 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 2350118 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT147 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 2350101 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235057 FPSEstimated 68%RX 7700 XT43 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 235020 FPSEstimated 64%
Forza Horizon 5RX 7700 XT215 FPSEstimated 80%ATI Radeon HD 2350149 FPSEstimated 78%RX 7700 XT139 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235096 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT130 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235071 FPSEstimated 68%RX 7700 XT94 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 235044 FPSEstimated 64%
God of War RagnarökRX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7700 XT139 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235096 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT117 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235080 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT94 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 235051 FPSEstimated 68%RX 7700 XT44 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 235021 FPSEstimated 64%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%
StarfieldRX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235022 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235018 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 235011 FPSEstimated 60%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 23505 FPSEstimated 56%
Average FPSRX 7700 XT98 FPSATI Radeon HD 235068 FPSRX 7700 XT75 FPSATI Radeon HD 235051 FPSRX 7700 XT59 FPSATI Radeon HD 235032 FPSRX 7700 XT31 FPSATI Radeon HD 235015 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 2350Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100623848%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100683078%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100672979%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100807168%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008410017%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexRX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 2350Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100702498%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100692691%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100672979%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1007221110%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100672979%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 2350
DirectX12.210.0
Vulkan1.4
OpenGL4.64.4
UpscalingFSR
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 2350
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Not publicly specified
Process node5 nmBetter65 nm
Release date20232007
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 2350
Transistor count28100 millionNot publicly specified
Die size346 mm²Not publicly specified
Shader units / cores3456Not publicly specified
Base clock1700 MHzBetter525 MHz
Boost clock2544 MHzBetter525 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 2350
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 1x16
Length267 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotVaries by board
Recommended PSU550 WVaries by board
Power connector8+8 pin

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 2350
HDMIHDMI 2.1a
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors4Varies by board
Max resolution7680 × 4320Varies by board

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 2350 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsRX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 2350
VRAM12 GB GDDR6256 MB DDR2Better
Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS35.17Better0.048
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 7700 XT74
Device BATI Radeon HD 235062
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 7700 XT or ATI Radeon HD 2350?

RX 7700 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 7700 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RX 7700 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RX 7700 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 7700 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 7700 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RX 7700 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 7700 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 7700 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7700 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 7700 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

ATI Radeon HD 2350 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

ATI Radeon HD 2350 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 7700 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.