AMD
Radeon RX 7700 XT vs ATI Radeon HD 3850
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
ATI Radeon HD 3850
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 7700 XT outperforms ATI Radeon HD 3850 by 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+59%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Radeon RX 7700 XT vs ATI Radeon HD 3850: key takeaway
The comparison of RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 shows a 59% advantage for RX 7700 XT in gaming performance, while ATI Radeon HD 3850 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6239
84100
100100
8013
COMPARISON RESULT
RX 7700 XT is the best overall choice
RX 7700 XT leads in combined game performance. RX 7700 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 7700 XT leads in the combined performance index
ATI Radeon HD 3850 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 17–22of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
ATI Radeon HD 3850
99 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 3850
100/100 · Price $119The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
62Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
51Better
34
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
84
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
74Better
62
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1—
HDMIHDMI 2.1a—
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingFSR—
USB Type-CYesNo
DirectX12.210.1
Vulkan1.4—
OpenGL4.63.3
TFLOPS35.17Better0.427
Power consumption245 W75 WBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Power connector8+8 pin6 pin
Release date20232007
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0TeraScale
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2—
Launch price$449$119Better
Shader units / cores3456Better320
Clock speed1700 - 2544 MHzBetter670 MHz
Base clock1700 MHzBetter670 MHz
Boost clock2544 MHzBetter670 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR6512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory frequency18 GHzBetter1,66 GHz
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth432 GB/sBetter53 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Power consumption245 W75 WBetter
Process node5 nmBetter55 nm
Recommended PSU550 W250 WBetter
Length267 mm208 mmBetter
Die size346 mm²192 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL2 0.25 MBBetter
Transistor count28100 millionBetter666 million
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RX 7700 XTATI Radeon HD 3850
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
31 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
27 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 66%
11 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 64%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongRX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385011 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 38505 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385011 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 38505 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RX 7700 XT264 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 3850196 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT186 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 3850138 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT144 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 385077 FPSEstimated 66%RX 7700 XT64 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 385029 FPSEstimated 63%
Cyberpunk 2077RX 7700 XT171 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 3850127 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT147 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 3850109 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT105 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 385056 FPSEstimated 66%RX 7700 XT43 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 385020 FPSEstimated 63%
Forza Horizon 5RX 7700 XT215 FPSEstimated 80%ATI Radeon HD 3850160 FPSEstimated 78%RX 7700 XT139 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 3850104 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT130 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 385070 FPSEstimated 66%RX 7700 XT94 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 385043 FPSEstimated 63%
God of War RagnarökRX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385011 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 38505 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRX 7700 XT139 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 3850104 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT117 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 385087 FPSEstimated 72%RX 7700 XT94 FPSEstimated 74%ATI Radeon HD 385050 FPSEstimated 66%RX 7700 XT44 FPSEstimated 72%ATI Radeon HD 385020 FPSEstimated 63%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385011 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 38505 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385011 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 38505 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRX 7700 XT31 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385023 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT27 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385020 FPSEstimated 64%RX 7700 XT20 FPSEstimated 66%ATI Radeon HD 385011 FPSEstimated 58%RX 7700 XT10 FPSEstimated 64%ATI Radeon HD 38505 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100623946%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100683369%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100673271%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008013144%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008410017%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100702789%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100692885%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100673271%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 1007224100%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100673173%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.210.1
Vulkan1.4—
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSR—
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2—
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0TeraScale
Process node5 nmBetter55 nm
Release date20232007
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count28100 millionBetter666 million
Die size346 mm²192 mm²Better
Shader units / cores3456Better320
Base clock1700 MHzBetter670 MHz
Boost clock2544 MHzBetter670 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 2x16
Length267 mm208 mmBetter
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU550 W250 WBetter
Power connector8+8 pin6 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1a—
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.1—
USB Type-CYesNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43202560 × 1600
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RX 7700 XT and ATI Radeon HD 3850 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM12 GB GDDR6512 MB GDDR3Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS35.17Better0.427
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Arc A310Intel
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7700 XT or ATI Radeon HD 3850?+
RX 7700 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 7700 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7700 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7700 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7700 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 7700 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7700 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 7700 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7700 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7700 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7700 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 3850 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 3850 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7700 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.