H2H

Radeon Vega II 7CU 5600G vs GeForce 210

Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vega II 7CU 5600G outperforms 210 by 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+42%

Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.
QUICK COMPARISON ANALYSIS

Radeon Vega II 7CU 5600G vs GeForce 210: key takeaway

The comparison of Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 shows a 42% advantage for Vega II 7CU 5600G in gaming performance, while 210 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

H2H
Performance
Price / performance
Performance
4431
Price / performance
100100
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMPARISON RESULT

Vega II 7CU 5600G is the best overall choice

Vega II 7CU 5600G leads in combined game performance. Vega II 7CU 5600G offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE2%

Vega II 7CU 5600G leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE$110

210 costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 137–142of 319
Vega II 7CU 5600Gnot in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
210not in TOP100position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon Vega II 7CU 5600G

173 likes

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 210

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

OVERALL SCORE

Overview

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

The Summary score section compares Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

CategoryVega II 7CU 5600G210
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44Better
31
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
51
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
57
FULL COMPARISON

Specifications

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

The Specifications section compares Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationVega II 7CU 5600G210
Memory typeSMADDR3
Memory bandwidth10 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2x16
Power consumption31 W
Release date20212009
Vulkan1.2Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSRNot supported
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
Memory frequency1,2 GHz
Device classDesktopDesktop
DirectX12.210.1
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2
Power consumption31 W
TFLOPS1.9Better0.039
VRAM- SMA1 GB DDR3
Launch price$79
Clock speed300 - 1900 MHz589 MHzBetter
Base clock300 MHz589 MHzBetter
Boost clock1900 MHzBetter589 MHz
Process node7 nmBetter40 nm
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160
USB Type-CNoNo
Recommended PSUVaries by board200 W
LengthVaries by board168 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardSingle-slot
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedTesla 2.0
Transistor countNot publicly specified260 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified57 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified16
Memory cacheNot publicly specifiedL2 0.03 MB
Power connectorIntegrated (shared power)None
Memory busSystem memory interface64 bit
GAME TEST BENCH

Gaming FPS

Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.

The Gaming FPS section compares Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.

Vega II 7CU 5600G210
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong

Black Myth: Wukong

1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
18 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
18 FPSEstimated 66%
16 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
14 FPSEstimated 66%
8 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
8 FPSEstimated 66%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Game1080p High1080p Ultra1440p Ultra4K Ultra
Black Myth: WukongVega II 7CU 5600G22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 5600G8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneVega II 7CU 5600G22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 5600G8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2Vega II 7CU 5600G183 FPSEstimated 74%210154 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 7CU 5600G128 FPSEstimated 74%210108 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 7CU 5600G100 FPSEstimated 74%21058 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 5600G50 FPSEstimated 74%21021 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077Vega II 7CU 5600G118 FPSEstimated 74%210100 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 7CU 5600G101 FPSEstimated 74%21086 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 7CU 5600G72 FPSEstimated 74%21042 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 5600G33 FPSEstimated 74%21014 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5Vega II 7CU 5600G149 FPSEstimated 80%210126 FPSEstimated 78%Vega II 7CU 5600G96 FPSEstimated 74%21081 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 7CU 5600G90 FPSEstimated 74%21052 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 5600G73 FPSEstimated 74%21031 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökVega II 7CU 5600G22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 5600G8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyVega II 7CU 5600G96 FPSEstimated 74%21081 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 7CU 5600G80 FPSEstimated 74%21068 FPSEstimated 72%Vega II 7CU 5600G65 FPSEstimated 74%21038 FPSEstimated 66%Vega II 7CU 5600G34 FPSEstimated 74%21014 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024Vega II 7CU 5600G22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 5600G8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsVega II 7CU 5600G22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 5600G8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldVega II 7CU 5600G22 FPSEstimated 66%21018 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G18 FPSEstimated 66%21016 FPSEstimated 64%Vega II 7CU 5600G14 FPSEstimated 66%2108 FPSEstimated 58%Vega II 7CU 5600G8 FPSEstimated 66%2105 FPSEstimated 55%
Average FPSVega II 7CU 5600G68 FPS21057 FPSVega II 7CU 5600G51 FPS21044 FPSVega II 7CU 5600G41 FPS21024 FPSVega II 7CU 5600G24 FPS21011 FPS
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

The Benchmarks section compares Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexVega II 7CU 5600G210Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100443135%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100473141%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100443426%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100043200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1000100200%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

The Detailed comparison section compares Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

IndexVega II 7CU 5600G210Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100443620%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100443620%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100443426%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100443815%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100443523%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.

Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling

The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsVega II 7CU 5600G210
DirectX12.210.1
Vulkan1.2Not supported
OpenGL4.63.3
UpscalingFSRNot supported
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 1.1, CUDA 1.2

Architecture and release

The Architecture and release section compares Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsVega II 7CU 5600G210
ArchitectureNot publicly specifiedTesla 2.0
Process node7 nmBetter40 nm
Release date20212009
Device classDesktopDesktop

GPU cores, die and clocks

The Core layout and clocks section compares Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsVega II 7CU 5600G210
Transistor countNot publicly specified260 million
Die sizeNot publicly specified57 mm²
Shader units / coresNot publicly specified16
Base clock300 MHz589 MHzBetter
Boost clock1900 MHzBetter589 MHz

Board size, power and compatibility

The Form factor and compatibility section compares Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsVega II 7CU 5600G210
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2x16
LengthVaries by board168 mm
ThicknessVaries by boardSingle-slot
Recommended PSUVaries by board200 W
Power connectorIntegrated (shared power)None

Display outputs and limits

The Display outputs section compares Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsVega II 7CU 5600G210
HDMIHDMI 2.1Board dependent
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4aDisplayPort
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors43
Max resolution7680 × 43204096 × 2160

Memory and compute throughput

The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Vega II 7CU 5600G and 210 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.

SpecificationsVega II 7CU 5600G210
VRAM- SMA1 GB DDR3
Memory typeSMADDR3
Memory busSystem memory interface64 bit
TFLOPS1.9Better0.039
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device AVega II 7CU 5600G58
Device B21057
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Frequently asked comparison questions

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Vega II 7CU 5600G or 210?

Vega II 7CU 5600G has the higher overall gaming score, while Vega II 7CU 5600G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

210 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

210 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Vega II 7CU 5600G offers more overall performance, while Vega II 7CU 5600G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

210 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Vega II 7CU 5600G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Vega II 7CU 5600G leads in combined 1440p performance. Vega II 7CU 5600G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Vega II 7CU 5600G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

210 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

210 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Vega II 7CU 5600G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.