Intel Arc A770VSRadeon RX 7800 XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A770+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Arc A770
VSWINNERArc A7700%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 7800 XT
Rendimiento5962
Eficiencia8779
Price / Performance10097
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
5962
8779
10097
8888
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelArc A7700No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 7800 XT0No verified public setup yet
RESULTADO DE LA COMPARACIÓN
The devices received the same overall score
Arc A770 leads in combined gaming performance. Arc A770 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Arc A770 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 16–21of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A770
0 Me gustaHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A770
100/100 · Price $329The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
PUNTUACIÓN GENERAL
Resumen
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
59
62Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
55
57Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46
49Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
87Better
79
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
72
72
COMPARACIÓN COMPLETA
Especificaciones
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Memory cache——
Clock speed2100 - 2400 MHzBetter1295 - 2430 MHz
Base clock2100 MHzBetter1295 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHz2430 MHzBetter
VRAM16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
VRAM capacity16 GB16 GB
Frecuencia de memoria16 GHz19,4 GHzBetter
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s621 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Power connector8+8 pin8+8 pin
Power consumption225 WBetter263 W
TDP225 WBetter263 W
Process node6 nm5 nmBetter
Release date20222023Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS19.6637.32Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
FPS en juegos
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10059625%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10067693%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10067693%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10088880%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100877910%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10072743%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10071721%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10067693%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10075761%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10068703%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Información básica
Architecture——
Process node6 nm5 nmMejor
Release date20222023Mejor
Launch price——
Especificaciones detalladas
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock2100 MHzMejor1295 MHz
Boost clock2400 MHz2430 MHzMejor
Formato y compatibilidad
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8+8 pin8+8 pin
Capacidad y tipo de VRAM
VRAM16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s621 GB/sMejor
Memory cache——
Conectividad y salidas
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
Compatibilidad con API y SDK
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Otras comparaciones
205NVIDIAReseñas y preguntas
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Preguntas frecuentes sobre la comparación
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A770 or RX 7800 XT?+
Arc A770 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A770 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A770 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A770 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A770 offers more overall performance, while Arc A770 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc A770 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A770 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A770 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A770 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A770 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A770 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A770 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A770 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.