H2H

Radeon RX 6700 XTVSGeForce RTX 5090

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Tested in 0 games3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Radeon RX 6700 XT
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6700 XT+8%Better overall performance
GeForce RTX 5090
AMDRX 6700 XT

₺11.757,03Average price

VS

₺117.570,26Average price

NVIDIARTX 5090
VS
WINNERRX 6700 XT7%H2H overall index
Performans5778
Verimlilik8345
Price / Performance10044
Data confidence7575

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

RX 6700 XTRadeon RX 6700 XTAMD
RTX 5090GeForce RTX 5090NVIDIA
H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
5778
Efficiency
8345
Price / performance
10044
Memory capacity
80100
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA

Hardware used by streamers

Real public setups linked to each device.

Open streamer setups
Radeon RX 6700 XTAMDRX 6700 XT0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
VS
GeForce RTX 5090NVIDIARTX 50900

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
KARŞILAŞTIRMA SONUCU

RX 6700 XT is the best overall choice

RX 6700 XT leads in combined gaming performance. RX 6700 XT offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE8%

RX 6700 XT leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE₺105.813

RX 6700 XT costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 34–39of 723
RX 6700 XT#36position in the GPU ranking
RTX 5090#62position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 6700 XT

0 beğeni

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

Radeon RX 6700 XT

100/100 · Price $479

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

GENEL PUAN

Genel bakış

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRX 6700 XTRTX 5090
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
57
78Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
51
82Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
45
60Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
83Better
45
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
70Better
65
TAM KARŞILAŞTIRMA

Özellikler

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRX 6700 XTRTX 5090
Clock speed2321 - 2581 MHzBetter2017 - 2407 MHz
Base clock2321 MHzBetter2017 MHz
Boost clock2581 MHzBetter2407 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR632 GB GDDR7Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7Better
VRAM capacity12 GB32 GBBetter
Bellek frekansı16 GHz28 GHzBetter
Memory bus192 bit512 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s1792 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 5x16Better
Power connector6+8 pin16 pinBetter
Power consumption230 WBetter575 W
TDP230 WBetter575 W
Process node7 nm4 nmBetter
Release date20212025Better
Architecture
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Maximum displays
Maximum resolution
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
TFLOPS13.21104.8Better
Launch price
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Memory cache

Oyun FPS

Loading test-rig results…

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRX 6700 XTRTX 5090Difference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100577831%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100658223%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100638429%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008010022%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100834559%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRX 6700 XTRTX 5090Difference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100678827%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100668727%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100638429%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100699026%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100648528%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

Basic information

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTRTX 5090
Architecture
Process node7 nm4 nmBetter
Release date20212025Better
Launch price

Detailed specifications

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTRTX 5090
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Base clock2321 MHzBetter2017 MHz
Boost clock2581 MHzBetter2407 MHz

Form factor and compatibility

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTRTX 5090
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 5x16Better
Length
Thickness
Recommended PSU
Power connector6+8 pin16 pinBetter

VRAM capacity and type

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTRTX 5090
VRAM12 GB GDDR632 GB GDDR7Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7Better
Memory bus192 bit512 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s1792 GB/sBetter
Memory cache

Connectivity and outputs

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTRTX 5090
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Maximum displays
Maximum resolution

API and SDK compatibility

SpecificationsRX 6700 XTRTX 5090
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 6700 XT70
Device BRTX 509065
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Karşılaştırma hakkında sık sorulanlar

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 6700 XT or RTX 5090?

RX 6700 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6700 XT offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

RTX 5090 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

RTX 5090 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 6700 XT offers more overall performance, while RTX 5090 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

RTX 5090 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 6700 XT is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 6700 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 5090 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 6700 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

RX 6700 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

RX 6700 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 6700 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.