Intel Arc A380VSGeForce RTX 3080
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A380+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Arc A380
VSWINNERArc A3800%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
RTX 3080
Hiệu năng4154
Hiệu quả10056
Price / Performance10096
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4154
10056
10096
6074
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelArc A3800No verified public setup yet
NVIDIARTX 30800No verified public setup yet
KẾT QUẢ SO SÁNH
The devices received the same overall score
Arc A380 leads in combined gaming performance. Arc A380 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Arc A380 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 73–78of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A380
0 lượt thíchHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A380
100/100 · Price $139The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
ĐIỂM TỔNG
Tổng quan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
41
54Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
47Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34
43Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
56
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63
63
SO SÁNH ĐẦY ĐỦ
Thông số
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Clock speed300 - 2000 MHz1440 - 1710 MHzBetter
Base clock300 MHz1440 MHzBetter
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter1710 MHz
VRAM6 GB GDDR610 GB GDDR6XBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
VRAM capacity6 GB10 GBBetter
Xung nhịp bộ nhớ15,5 GHz19 GHzBetter
Memory bus96 bit320 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth186 GB/s760 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Power connector6 pin16 pinBetter
Power consumption75 WBetter320 W
TDP75 WBetter320 W
Process node6 nmBetter8 nm
Release date2022Better2020
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS4.19829.77Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS trong game
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100415427%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100485819%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100466026%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100607421%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005656%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100506323%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100496223%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100466026%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100526522%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100476024%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node6 nmBetter8 nm
Release date2022Better2020
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock300 MHz1440 MHzBetter
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter1710 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector6 pin16 pinBetter
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM6 GB GDDR610 GB GDDR6XBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Memory bus96 bit320 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth186 GB/s760 GB/sBetter
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
740M 8300GAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Câu hỏi thường gặp về so sánh
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A380 or RTX 3080?+
Arc A380 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A380 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3080 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3080 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A380 offers more overall performance, while RTX 3080 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3080 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A380 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A380 leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3080 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A380 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A380 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A380 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A380 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.