Radeon RX 7900 XTVSIntel Arc A750
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 7900 XT+1%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 7900 XT
VSWINNERRX 7900 XT1%H2H overall index
Intel
Arc A750
Leistung6756
Effizienz7183
Price / Performance83100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6756
7183
83100
9568
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX 7900 XT0No verified public setup yet
IntelArc A7500No verified public setup yet
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
RX 7900 XT is the best overall choice
RX 7900 XT leads in combined gaming performance. Arc A750 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 7900 XT leads in the combined performance index
Arc A750 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 27–32of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7900 XT
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A750
100/100 · Price $289The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
67Better
56
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
64Better
47
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
52Better
44
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
71
83Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
71Better
70
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1500 - 2400 MHz2050 - 2400 MHzBetter
Base clock1500 MHz2050 MHzBetter
Boost clock2400 MHz2400 MHz
VRAM20 GB GDDR6Better8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
VRAM capacity20 GBBetter8 GB
Speichertakt20 GHzBetter16 GHz
Memory bus320 bitBetter256 bit
Memory bandwidth800 GB/sBetter512 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Power connector8+8 pinBetter6+8 pin
Power consumption315 W225 WBetter
TDP315 W225 WBetter
Process node5 nmBetter6 nm
Release date20222022
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS51.48Better17.2
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100675618%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100736118%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100755924%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100956833%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100718316%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100796224%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100786124%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100755924%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100826326%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100756022%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
Architecture——
Process node5 nmBesser6 nm
Release date20222022
Launch price——
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1500 MHz2050 MHzBesser
Boost clock2400 MHz2400 MHz
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8+8 pinBesser6+8 pin
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM20 GB GDDR6Besser8 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus320 bitBesser256 bit
Memory bandwidth800 GB/sBesser512 GB/s
Memory cache——
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
205NVIDIABewertungen und Fragen
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7900 XT or Arc A750?+
RX 7900 XT has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A750 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7900 XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7900 XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7900 XT offers more overall performance, while RX 7900 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7900 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A750 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7900 XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7900 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7900 XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A750 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A750 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7900 XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.