Intel
Intel Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 590
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
AMD
RX 590
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc A380 and RX 590 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RX 590 outperforms Arc A380 by 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+14%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.Intel Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 590: key takeaway
The comparison of Arc A380 and RX 590 shows a 14% advantage for RX 590 in gaming performance, while Arc A380 may still be stronger in value for money. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
Intel
AMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3641
10061
100100
6068
COMPARISON RESULT
Arc A380 is the best overall choice
Arc A380 leads in combined game performance. Arc A380 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Arc A380 leads in the combined performance index
Arc A380 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 134–139of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 590
101 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A380
100/100 · Price $139The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares Arc A380 and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
36
41Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32
36Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
30
34Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
61
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60Better
56
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares Arc A380 and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0b
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingXeSS—
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS4.1987.119Better
Power consumption75 WBetter225 W
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Power connector6 pin8 pin
Release date20222018
ArchitectureXe-HPGGCN 4.0
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$139Better$309
Shader units / cores10242304Better
Clock speed300 - 2000 MHz1469 - 1545 MHzBetter
Base clock300 MHz1469 MHzBetter
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter1545 MHz
VRAM6 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR5Better
Memory frequency15,5 GHzBetter8 GHz
Memory bus96 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth186 GB/s256 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 3x16
Power consumption75 WBetter225 W
Process node6 nmBetter12 nm
Recommended PSU250 WBetter450 W
Length222 mmBetter241 mm
Die size157 mm²Better232 mm²
Memory cacheL2 4 MBBetterL1 16 KB, L2 2 MB
Transistor count7200 millionBetter5700 million
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares Arc A380 and RX 590 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
Arc A380RX 590
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
22 FPSEstimated 66%
23 FPSEstimated 66%
1080p Ultra
19 FPSEstimated 66%
19 FPSEstimated 66%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 59%
13 FPSEstimated 64%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 57%
Black Myth: WukongArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Call of Duty: WarzoneArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Counter-Strike 2Arc A380188 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590191 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A380129 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590134 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38069 FPSEstimated 67%RX 59097 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38023 FPSEstimated 62%RX 59032 FPSEstimated 65%
Cyberpunk 2077Arc A380121 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590123 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A380102 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590106 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38050 FPSEstimated 67%RX 59070 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38015 FPSEstimated 62%RX 59021 FPSEstimated 65%
Forza Horizon 5Arc A380153 FPSEstimated 80%RX 590155 FPSEstimated 80%Arc A38097 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590101 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38062 FPSEstimated 67%RX 59087 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38034 FPSEstimated 62%RX 59046 FPSEstimated 65%
God of War RagnarökArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Hogwarts LegacyArc A38099 FPSEstimated 74%RX 590101 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38081 FPSEstimated 74%RX 59084 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A38045 FPSEstimated 67%RX 59063 FPSEstimated 72%Arc A38016 FPSEstimated 62%RX 59022 FPSEstimated 65%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024Arc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
Monster Hunter WildsArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
StarfieldArc A38022 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59023 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38019 FPSEstimated 66%RX 59019 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A38010 FPSEstimated 59%RX 59013 FPSEstimated 64%Arc A3805 FPSEstimated 55%RX 5905 FPSEstimated 57%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares Arc A380 and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100364113%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10044477%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100434913%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100606813%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006148%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares Arc A380 and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100475312%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100465212%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100434913%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100495613%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100434913%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares Arc A380 and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.0
Vulkan1.41.3
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingXeSS—
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0OpenCL 2.1
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares Arc A380 and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureXe-HPGGCN 4.0
Process node6 nmBetter12 nm
Release date20222018
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares Arc A380 and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count7200 millionBetter5700 million
Die size157 mm²Better232 mm²
Shader units / cores10242304Better
Base clock300 MHz1469 MHzBetter
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter1545 MHz
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares Arc A380 and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 3x16
Length222 mmBetter241 mm
ThicknessDual-slotDual-slot
Recommended PSU250 WBetter450 W
Power connector6 pin8 pin
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares Arc A380 and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.0b
DisplayPortDisplayPort 2.0DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares Arc A380 and RX 590 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM6 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR5Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus96 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS4.1987.119Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
GTX 1050 3GBNVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A380 or RX 590?+
Arc A380 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A380 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A380 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A380 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A380 offers more overall performance, while Arc A380 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Arc A380 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A380 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A380 leads in combined 1440p performance. Arc A380 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A380 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A380 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A380 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A380 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.