NVIDIA
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Intel Arc A310
Full comparison of specs, performance and benchmarks
Intel
Arc A310
Aggregate performance score
We've compared RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 across specs and all relevant benchmarks.
↗RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms Arc A310 by 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.+18%
Scores are normalized on the Head to Head scale. Higher is better.GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Intel Arc A310: key takeaway
The comparison of RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 shows a 18% advantage for RTX 3050 6 GB in gaming performance, while Arc A310 may still be stronger in efficiency and feature set. Use the sections below to check whether that lead comes from real FPS, specifications, efficiency, price or platform features.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIA
IntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3933
100100
100100
6060
COMPARISON RESULT
RTX 3050 6 GB is the best overall choice
RTX 3050 6 GB leads in combined game performance. RTX 3050 6 GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RTX 3050 6 GB leads in the combined performance index
Arc A310 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 109–114of 317
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
82 likesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A310
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
OVERALL SCORE
Overview
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
The Summary score section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39Better
33
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
30
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
58
FULL COMPARISON
Specifications
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
The Specifications section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4amini-DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
Device classDesktopDesktop
UpscalingDLSS 2XeSS
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS6.774Better2.688
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power consumption70 WBetter75 W
Power connectorNoneNone
Release date20242022
ArchitectureAmpereXe-HPG
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0
Launch price$229$169Better
Shader units / cores2304Better768
Clock speed1042 - 1470 MHz1750 - 2000 MHzBetter
Base clock1042 MHz1750 MHzBetter
Boost clock1470 MHz2000 MHzBetter
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory frequency14 GHz15,5 GHzBetter
Memory bus96 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth168 GB/sBetter124 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Power consumption70 WBetter75 W
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 W200 WBetter
Length242 mmVaries by board
Die size200 mm²157 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL2 4 MBBetter
Transistor count8700 millionBetter7200 million
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
USB Type-CNoNo
GAME TEST BENCH
Gaming FPS
Available results are shown separately; missing data is not treated as zero.
The Gaming FPS section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 across curated H2H Lab game presets. The useful signal is not only average FPS, but also how each device behaves at 1440p and 4K, how memory capacity and bus width affect heavy textures, and whether the game engine favors raster performance, ray tracing, or driver maturity.
RTX 3050 6 GBArc A310
Verified H2HCommunity VerifiedEstimatedPredicted
Black Myth: Wukong
1080p High
24 FPSEstimated 66%
20 FPSEstimated 64%
1080p Ultra
20 FPSEstimated 65%
17 FPSEstimated 64%
1440p Ultra
10 FPSEstimated 58%
9 FPSEstimated 58%
4K Ultra
5 FPSEstimated 55%
5 FPSEstimated 55%
Black Myth: WukongRTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
Call of Duty: WarzoneRTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
Counter-Strike 2RTX 3050 6 GB206 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A310165 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 3050 6 GB140 FPSEstimated 73%Arc A310116 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 3050 6 GB74 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31062 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB25 FPSEstimated 62%Arc A31022 FPSEstimated 62%
Cyberpunk 2077RTX 3050 6 GB133 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A310106 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 3050 6 GB111 FPSEstimated 73%Arc A31092 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 3050 6 GB54 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31045 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB17 FPSEstimated 62%Arc A31015 FPSEstimated 62%
Forza Horizon 5RTX 3050 6 GB167 FPSEstimated 80%Arc A310134 FPSEstimated 78%RTX 3050 6 GB105 FPSEstimated 73%Arc A31087 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 3050 6 GB67 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31056 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB37 FPSEstimated 62%Arc A31033 FPSEstimated 62%
God of War RagnarökRTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
Hogwarts LegacyRTX 3050 6 GB108 FPSEstimated 74%Arc A31087 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 3050 6 GB88 FPSEstimated 73%Arc A31073 FPSEstimated 72%RTX 3050 6 GB48 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31041 FPSEstimated 66%RTX 3050 6 GB17 FPSEstimated 62%Arc A31015 FPSEstimated 62%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024RTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
Monster Hunter WildsRTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
StarfieldRTX 3050 6 GB24 FPSEstimated 66%Arc A31020 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB20 FPSEstimated 65%Arc A31017 FPSEstimated 64%RTX 3050 6 GB10 FPSEstimated 58%Arc A3109 FPSEstimated 58%RTX 3050 6 GB5 FPSEstimated 55%Arc A3105 FPSEstimated 55%
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
The Benchmarks section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100393317%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10044425%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10045419%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060600%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
The Detailed comparison section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10049459%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10048449%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10045419%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10051486%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10045419%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from a third-party benchmark.
Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling
The Graphics APIs, SDKs and upscaling section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
UpscalingDLSS 2XeSS
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6OpenCL 3.0
Architecture and release
The Architecture and release section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
ArchitectureAmpereXe-HPG
Process node8 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20242022
Device classDesktopDesktop
GPU cores, die and clocks
The Core layout and clocks section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
Transistor count8700 millionBetter7200 million
Die size200 mm²157 mm²Better
Shader units / cores2304Better768
Base clock1042 MHz1750 MHzBetter
Boost clock1470 MHz2000 MHzBetter
Board size, power and compatibility
The Form factor and compatibility section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Length242 mmVaries by board
ThicknessDual-slotSingle-slot
Recommended PSU250 W200 WBetter
Power connectorNoneNone
Display outputs and limits
The Display outputs section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
HDMIHDMI 2.1HDMI 2.1
DisplayPortDisplayPort 1.4amini-DisplayPort 2.0
USB Type-CNoNo
Max monitors44
Max resolution7680 × 43207680 × 4320
Memory and compute throughput
The VRAM capacity and bandwidth section compares RTX 3050 6 GB and Arc A310 with normalized H2H data, turning specifications, tests and value signals into practical buying context.
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus96 bitBetter64 bit
TFLOPS6.774Better2.688
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Navi II 2CU 7xxx/9xxxAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Frequently asked comparison questions
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RTX 3050 6 GB or Arc A310?+
RTX 3050 6 GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RTX 3050 6 GB offers more overall performance, while RTX 3050 6 GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RTX 3050 6 GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3050 6 GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RTX 3050 6 GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RTX 3050 6 GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.